Non-religious concepts
Most people get a religion after their birth for completely free. Children are taught things by their parents or other people, resources from their environment. They are obviously diverted to a religion. Most religions have a base book or books which is also called divine book of that religion. The followers of those religions believe their books after all.
There are thousands of religions in this world. Check the following link for detailed list on religions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religions
Different people have different religions. Majors are Christian, Islam etc. The followers think that their religion is the ultimate truth to life. For example, Christians think that their bible is the only true thing in the world, same goes for Quran of Muslims. Same happens for other religions. They claim that their individual books are from the God. For example a muslim (follower of Islam) will think that only Islam and Quran is the truth. Same might think the Christian. All believers of other religions also claim the same thing of their own.
So are all religions true? Christians know that only their bible and the religion is true and all others like Quran and other religions are wrong because one religion comes from God and not all religions are true. Same way thinks Muslims that their book Quran is true and all others false! Respectively other people believe their own religion and deny others.
Let’s dig a little bit deeper. There is only one God. Then one religion that he had created for human being should be the absolute truth.
Is there only one religion in the universe? I think no. And every follower of every religion claims for their God in own ways and says that their book is truth.
Hence neither a religion is true nor its books. God didn’t create religions. He didn’t create divisions on the mankind. All religions are self-claimed and therefore completely false.
It’s a general statement. There are thousands of proofs against every divine book that each is wrong! No book ever came from God! Why don’t give a try? Search with keywords contradictions in quran, contradictions in bible etc using a search engine.
Polytheism
Monotheists, how do you deny polytheism?
1. As you are theist you believe in God. But you didn’t see him all alone. Right?
2. Monotheist people generally would say if there were multiple God/Goddess or deities they’d have ruined the entire world to take the possession. Universe could never run in such harmony!
How do you know that Gods or those heavenly existences would fight each other. Gods are the wisest and prudent ever. They can obviously be in harmony of power!
If you believe monotheism you are admitting polytheism with tacit approval.
Not a conclusion really
- Thousand lies to protect one lie. That’s what religion is! And lie is poison. If you see the destruction/conflicts occurred by religious groups, if you look at the history you’d be astonished!
- Children shouldn’t be taught religions. Teach them the right thing not bogus religions. It doesn’t require mess of religions to understand what right is and what wrong is!
- Stand for mankind not for religion.
- The modern world is adopting Secularism where religions will have no effects on administration or politics. I hope you know how badly affected the civilization is by the religion politics.
- Here is a statistics of beliefs followed by people. People are coming out to light from darkness. The graph shows an improvement.
u should provide more information
ReplyDeleteTell me what kind of information I should provide. It will be highly appreciated.
ReplyDeleteReligion is simply a believe which will help when you are in trouble by something that is not avoidable.
ReplyDeleteJust diggin' with the conclusions...
ReplyDelete1. If you see the destruction/conflicts occurred by religious groups,
if you look at the history you’d be astonished!
True. But who is/are to be blamed for these conficts? The people? The
religion? Or even the God?? It's the people who can't think
rationally/logically and hence produce conflicts among views and
actions. God didn't prescribe any religion which has conflicts.
2. It doesn’t require mess of religions to understand what right is and
what wrong is!
Might be somewhat true. But, people still won't choose to do the right.
They would always run for evil. Then, how would you come up with a way
to establish the right and prevent the wrong? Wait, you don't need to
take time to think about it. Religion already provides these
guidelines...
3. Stand for mankind not for religion.
Religion IS for mankind. It never goes against mankind. It's the
mankind who uses religion for satisfying their selfish needs. The blame
is to be given not to religion, rather to those selfish people.
4. I hope you know how badly affected the civilization is by the
religion politics.
Again, religion is not to be blamed for it, rather the people should
be.
Conclusion from these?
If two people quarrel and kill one-another over the ownership of a car,
is the car to be blamed for the mess or those two people?? Religion is
not a problem. It is people who causes it to appear like a problem...
The other objections mentioned in the post are too easy to refute. Only
some logical analitical ability is needed to do so...
waiting for more on this topic...
ReplyDeletewe need god when we are in trouble. We believe in religion when we need to Neglect people of other religion.
ReplyDeleteWe bribe the god by praying (something like giving TEL(oil)) to get advantages in real life or life after death(!!!).
"we need god when we are in trouble. We believe in religion when we need to Neglect people of other religion."
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly what I was talking about: the people are the selfish one - when they're in trouble, they need god; when they're fine, they just leave him; when they need to neglect people of other religion, they start believing in one. Does any religion teach these???
"We bribe the god by praying (something like giving TEL(oil)) to get advantages in real life or life after death(!!!)."
Yeah - from people's point of view. God is such a fool that he can't even understand that the people (whom He created) are 'bribing' Him to get advantages!!! He doesn't even care if we don't do what He wants us to do. He needn't care whether we get advantages or are deprived of advantages. He just prescribed religion for our own good....
@Sharafat: I don't know how to appreciate your long mail. But thanks for your patience. You mentioned your opinions. I'll mention mine.
ReplyDelete>who is/are to be blamed for these conficts? The people? The religion? Or even the God??
Obviously not the people and not you are responsible for it. The imposters of religions are completely liable for this. They made thousand lies to protect one lie. We inherit religion from our ancestors. Do we ever think if everything is true? Do we ever think that said things might be wrong? Do we ever negotiate with followers of other religions considering the possibility that their beliefs might be true which in terms invalidates our beliefs? Do we ever think all infidels out of our religion would go to religion-made hell just because of no reason? God made the decision of giving birth to them in a different religion as desired. So do they deserve hell really?
>It's the people who can't think rationally/logically and hence produce conflicts among views and actions.
How will people be able to think? They poisons of religions are seeded from the very childhood of religious people.
Forget about the people. Can you think?
God didn't prescribe any religion which has conflicts.
You are right. This is what invalidates all religions because all religions have conflicts. You don't know because you never tried to find it out.
>But, people still won't choose to do the right. They would always run for evil.
Could ever any religion prevent people from doing wrong? How could they? Even they themselves are not right. Do some research. It's not hard to find out among thousands of errors and inconsistencies in major religions.
Don't say that sometimes it works. Who cares for this sometimes beneficial religions!
> Religion IS for mankind. It never goes against mankind. It's the mankind who uses religion for satisfying their selfish needs. The blame is to be given not to religion, rather to those elfish people.
Religions failed again! Using enough faults lying inbetween religions this is made happened. Do you know the suicide bombers take the oath straight from Quran. But it's a different point of view. If you were born in that culture you'd have believed same way. But now you're not coz you are not going to bomb some people tongiht. A religion is so fragile? Then what good will it bring? What Shiya, Sunni dividends? What about differentiated cultures on women?
Just curiosity, did you see a documentary named "Inside the Koran"? It will help you to have some of the insights.
Before you cannot think neutrally you'll be puzzled by religious errors and keep cycling. So try to think neutral first. What if you were not provided any religion from your birth? Then which religion would had been true to you?
> If two people quarrel and kill one-another over the ownership of a car, is the car to be blamed for the mess or those two people??
Does people believe the car more than their ilfe unless religion is involved? If they feel like the order is from their Boss and that came straight from Allah they will not mess with the car but anything definitely? Then who is responsible?
> The other objections mentioned in the post are too easy to refute.
You said "it's the people who can't think rationally/logically and hence produce conflicts among views and actions."
You should think rationally first. You'll understand how much true they are; not comparable with just religious beliefs.
valai choltese :D
ReplyDelete"Do we ever think if everything is true? Do we ever think that said things might be wrong? Do we ever negotiate with followers of other religions considering the possibility that their beliefs might be true which in terms invalidates our beliefs?"
ReplyDeleteAnswer to all the above questions: at least I did, even if we ignore the fact that millions of people before me did. I asked myself exactly the same question - is everything I hear about religion true? And behold! Throughout years of research, I found out the truth - not all I "hear" about MY religion are true due to people's ignorance while speaking. But, what I came to find out - all I read in the original texts of MY religion are indeed true and contradiction-free.
"Do we ever think all infidels out of our religion would go to religion-made hell just because of no reason? God made the decision of giving birth to them in a different religion as desired. So do they deserve hell really?"
Nope. They never deserve hell just because of God's decision. God made human the best of creations. Why? Because he gave him something called 'brain' to think logically. So, it is up to you whether you'd use it to find out the right thing. Whether you born in a Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Atheist family, you must think whether what you're learning is the right thing. If you don't use your brain to know the right thing and consequently follow the wrong path, shouldn't you deserve punishment?
"How will people be able to think? The poisons of religions are seeded from the very childhood of religious people."
Again, this is people's fault, not religion's.
"Forget about the people. Can you think?"
At least I try to.
"God didn't prescribe any religion which has conflicts.
You are right. This is what invalidates all religions because all religions have conflicts. You don't know because you never tried to find it out."
False. Rather I tried my best to find out. The result? At least I didn't find any contradiction in the Quraan and the authentic Prophetic traditions. If you've found one, you're welcome to mention it. :)
"Could ever any religion prevent people from doing wrong?"
Yeah. During the life of the Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), Islaam prevented people from doing wrong. You can read any history book mentioning that period for details. It's only one example.
"If you were born in that culture you'd have believed same way. But now you're not coz you are not going to bomb some people tongiht."
Wrong. Rather I'm not coz I KNOW the right thing from the very religious texts.
"What Shiya, Sunni dividends? What about differentiated cultures on women?"
Again, these are not religion's fault, rather people's. What about contradictions among the scientists about a scientific issue?? You must provide valid proof to justify you're the correct one. Same is true in the above mentioned cases. However, as people are blind and emotional, they don't want to accept proofs. That's why the contradictory views persist. Again, that's not religion's problem.
"What if you were not provided any religion from your birth? Then which religion would had been true to you?"
According to what I've mentioned before, I was a Muslim by birth before; now I'm a Muslim by choice.
"If they feel like the order is from their Boss and that came straight from Allah they will not mess with the car but anything definitely? Then who is responsible?"
The people is responsible. Why would they 'feel' that the order is from their boss? Rather they should 'verify' that the order is indeed from their boss and only then act accordingly. And it's certain that the boss won't order them something wrong to do, isn't it?
@Sreezin: If you want to just believe things for things there are many ideas and forms of things that actually work when you are in a challenging situation.
ReplyDeleteReligion kills much of your insights by showing wrong fear and superstition.
Is the world flat still now?
So you and your 21% find yourselves really brainy!! And others are all ignorant!! :D
ReplyDeleteYou have been grown up in islamic environment and you grown up as strict follower of Islam!! I know you'd have been same way follower of christian if you were born in christian environment.
If you were following Christian(or any other religion) strictly still being born in Muslim it might convinced me! But now you are dumb fool follower underestimating others!
You are overestimating your brain. What about the people who are inborn less merited? Are they not so called "Ashraful Makhlukhat"? The people who are more intelligent than you, do they make you inferior creation? If a beast; which you call beast for example chimpanzees get a better brain than the dumb human being. Then is that a better creation? Possibly "Ashraful Makhlukhat"!
I'm not really convinced. And I'm not amazed by your research result! There are so many errors and inconsistencies, you find out none!
Islam was kind of suitable for primitive times. It's completely worn out!
You are saying something about original text. What did Allah say in Quran?
Allah says: [We have revealed the Reminder and We have taken upon ourselves the duty of preserving it intact] (Al-Hijr 15:9).
So don't make us fool telling about your authenticity.
Don't keep yourself blind. Open your eyes.
And just don't decline seeing the links.. Research them please and do in amazing way. Remember only one error found in Quran invalidates the whole Quran. And trust there is not one!
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/contradictions.htm
http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/errors2.asp
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=54
If you want use google to find more and use your quran to match them.
"If you were following Christian(or any other religion) strictly still being born in Muslim it might convinced me! But now you are dumb fool follower underestimating others!"
ReplyDeleteWhat about the other way around?? If somebody is following Islaam strictly still being born in Christian (or any other religion), would it convince you??? Don't keep yourself blind. Open your eyes. You'll be able to see that thousands of Christians and followers of other religions are accepting Islaam within their strict religious environment. Even Christian priests became Muslims after they sought for the truth and not just stayed as a simple Muslim, rather became scholars in comparing Islaam, Christianity and other religions (and of course, atheism). Were they paid for it or did they do it by making use of their own brain?
About what you said on people with less merit and beasts having better brain than human.
It seems that you've misunderstood the meaning of "the best of the creations". It refers to the mankind as a whole and not to individual persons. Man can think better than other animals in orders of magnitudes. There is of course differences of level of merit among people, but even the dumbest person can think much more better than any beast.
"Islam was kind of suitable for primitive times. It's completely worn out!"
There is no doubt that many scientific facts which were revealed relatively recently were already mentioned in the Quraan 1400 years ago. Then is it primitive or thousand years advanced?? Rather Islaam is completely compatible with time. Its rulings are formulated in such a way that those would be best suited to current people as well as to those coming later.
"You are saying something about original text.
Allah says: [...] (Al-Hijr 15:9).
So don't make us fool telling about your authenticity."
If I'm not mistaken, you've misunderstood my word "original text". It means the Quraan and the authentic Prophetic traditions. All other books referencing these sources are not considered as original. Rather the case is similar to the fact that we learned Newton's laws of motion from our H.S.C physics book - it's not the original book on laws of motion; rather the book written by Newton on these laws is called the original book.
Quraan has been and always will be preserved as it was revealed. Have any proof that it hasn't been? Anybody's welcome to put it forth. :)
"And just don't decline seeing the links.. Research them please and do in amazing way."
A true researcher never declines to study the logic of other views, and hence neither do I. Rather I already DID research on the issues posed in your provided links long ago.
Let me take as example only the first issue provided on the first link. You can find the answer to it at the following link:
http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/31865/
Similarly, answer to all the other issues can be found easily. Just google with "refuting contradictions in quran". (It's been 3 years since I left out my research work on these things. That's why collecting together all the issues would take me a lot of time right now. And hence I rather asked just to google.)
"Remember only one error found in Quran invalidates the whole Quran."
Everybody should agree to it without any doubt.
"And trust there is not one!"
Of course there is not one... I totally agree!!!
Bro, your sentence means "there is not any error", or more readably, "there is no error".
I believe you wanted to say, "And trust there is not ONLY one!". Rather believe it or not - all of those so-called errors have already been refuted by so many people!
LOL.
ReplyDeleteYou shouldn't had left your research. You got a point that patched with a fatwa. Leaving the strong points for refuting with google is really disappointing..
First read this: http://sa-sdft.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_09.html
Answer me these:
ā§§ āĻৃāĻ¤āĻĻাāĻ¸ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻ¨িāĻˇিāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨āĻ¨ি āĻেāĻ¨?
ā§¨ āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽāĻĻ āĻ¸া. āĻৃāĻ¤āĻĻাāĻ¸āĻĻেāĻ° āĻšāĻ āĻ¨িāĻ¯়ে āĻŦিāĻĻাāĻ¯়ী āĻšāĻ্āĻ্āĻŦāĻ¸āĻš āĻŦিāĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯়ে āĻ āĻ¨েāĻ āĻিāĻু āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ˛েāĻ, āĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻ°āĻĻে āĻূāĻŽিāĻা āĻ¨িāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ো?
ā§Š āĻেāĻšাāĻĻে āĻĒāĻ°াāĻিāĻ¤ āĻĒāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ° āĻŽāĻšিāĻ˛াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¨িāĻ āĻ āĻ§িāĻাāĻ°āĻূāĻ্āĻ¤ āĻĻাāĻ¸ী āĻšিāĻ¸াāĻŦে āĻāĻŖ্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ°ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻোāĻ āĻāĻ°া āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻেāĻ¨ āĻাāĻ¯়েāĻ(āĻāĻে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻি?) āĻāĻ°া āĻšāĻ¯়েāĻ?
ā§Ē āĻāĻāĻে āĻŦুāĻļ āĻŦাāĻšিāĻ¨ী āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°াāĻ/ āĻāĻĢāĻাāĻ¨িāĻ¸্āĻ¤াāĻ¨āĻ¸āĻš āĻŦিāĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻĻেāĻļāĻĻāĻāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ে āĻ¯ে āĻ¨াāĻ°ী-āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻ¯াāĻ¤āĻ¨-āĻ§āĻ°্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻাāĻ˛াāĻ¯়, āĻ¤া āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ§āĻ°্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻšāĻ¯়- āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻ¨āĻŦী-āĻāĻ˛িāĻĢা-āĻ¸াāĻšাāĻŦীāĻ°া āĻ¯া āĻāĻ°েāĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻে āĻ¨াāĻ°ী āĻ§āĻ°্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšāĻŦে āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ো? (āĻŦুāĻļāĻŦাāĻšিāĻ¨ী āĻে āĻৃāĻŖা)। āĻ¨া-āĻি āĻāĻ্āĻ¤ āĻŦিāĻ§াāĻ¨ āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻিāĻšাāĻĻীāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯; āĻ āĻ°্āĻĨাāĻ¤- āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻĒāĻ°াāĻিāĻ¤ āĻĒāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ° āĻ¨াāĻ°ীāĻĻেāĻ° āĻোāĻ āĻāĻ°া āĻ§āĻ°্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻāĻŦং āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻুāĻŦāĻ āĻাāĻ¯়েāĻ āĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻ¯়াāĻŦেāĻ° āĻাāĻŽ(āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻāĻĻেāĻļ/āĻĒāĻ°াāĻŽāĻ°্āĻļ āĻĻেāĻāĻ¯়া āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻ¨ে āĻ¤ো āĻ¸āĻāĻ¯়াāĻŦ āĻšāĻ¯় āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻ āĻ¤ো āĻাāĻ¨ি!!)
ā§Ģ 'āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻাāĻ˛েāĻ°, āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻ¯ুāĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻŦিāĻৃāĻ¤āĻাāĻŦে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯' āĻāĻŦং 'āĻ āĻāĻ¯়াāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻ¯িāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻĻাāĻ¸ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻিāĻ˛ো, āĻ¸ে āĻĒāĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻĨাāĻা āĻāĻ¸েāĻিāĻ˛ো' - āĻāĻĻুāĻি āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯় āĻি?
ā§Ŧ āĻ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯়েāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ˛েāĻ- āĻĒāĻ°াāĻিāĻ¤ āĻĒāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ° āĻ¨াāĻ°ীāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻি āĻ¤া āĻŦāĻ°্āĻŦāĻ°āĻ¤া āĻিāĻ˛ āĻ¨া?
ā§ 'āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸া. āĻāĻ° āĻāĻĨা-āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻāĻŖেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻāĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়, āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻ¸āĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়' āĻ 'āĻ āĻšুāĻুāĻŽ āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ°āĻ āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯, āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¨āĻ¯়'- āĻāĻĻুāĻিāĻ āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯়?
ā§ āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš(āĻŦাāĻ˛্āĻ¯ āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš ) āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻ°āĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ো āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ো? āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸. āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻļেāĻˇ (āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšāĻৃāĻ¤) āĻ¸্āĻ¤্āĻ°ী āĻŦিāĻŦি āĻāĻ¯়েāĻļা āĻ°া. āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ (āĻ¤িāĻ¨ি āĻ¨āĻŦীāĻীāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦাāĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇা āĻĒ্āĻ°িāĻ¯়āĻ āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻাāĻ¨া āĻ¯াāĻ¯়) āĻāĻāĻে āĻāĻ āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻেāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻāĻ˛ে, āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻি āĻāĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦে?
Do you underestimate Lalon? What about this song of lalon:
http://sa-sdft.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_8758.html
What about this lines from Kazi Nazrul Islam
āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ°ে āĻৃāĻŖা āĻāĻ°ি'
āĻ āĻাāĻ°া āĻোāĻ°াāĻ¨, āĻŦেāĻĻ, āĻŦাāĻāĻŦেāĻ˛ āĻুāĻŽ্āĻŦিāĻে āĻŽāĻ°ি' āĻŽāĻ°ি'
āĻ āĻŽুāĻ āĻšāĻāĻ¤ে āĻেāĻ¤াāĻŦ-āĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨ āĻ¨াāĻ āĻোāĻ° āĻ'āĻ°ে āĻেāĻĄ়ে,
āĻ¯াāĻšাāĻ°া āĻāĻ¨িāĻ˛ āĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨ-āĻেāĻ¤াāĻŦ āĻ¸েāĻ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ°ে āĻŽেāĻ°ে।
āĻĒূāĻিāĻে āĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨ āĻāĻ¨্āĻĄেāĻ° āĻĻāĻ˛! - āĻŽূāĻ°্āĻāĻ°া āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻļোāĻ¨ো,
āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻāĻ¨েāĻে āĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨ; - āĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨ āĻāĻ¨েāĻ¨ি āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻোāĻ¨ো!
......।
(āĻ¨āĻāĻ°ুāĻ˛)
āĻ¸েāĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°াāĻীāĻ¨āĻাāĻ˛ āĻĨেāĻে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ¨া āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ¸ংāĻেāĻ°/āĻোāĻ¤্āĻ°েāĻ° āĻ āĻ§ীāĻ¨ে āĻĨাāĻে āĻļুāĻ§ুāĻŽাāĻ¤্āĻ° āĻিāĻু āĻŦাā§āĻ¤ি āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻĒাāĻā§াāĻ° āĻāĻļাā§।
ReplyDeleteāĻ¸েāĻ āĻĻিāĻ āĻĨেāĻে āĻŦিāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ে āĻ¤ āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻĻাঁā§াā§ āĻāĻŽি āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻāĻা āĻĻাāĻŦি āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ে āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¸াāĻšাāĻ¯্āĻ¯ āĻĒেāĻ¤ে āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া। āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻি āĻāĻŽি āĻিāĻু āĻŦাā§āĻ¤ি āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻāĻĻাā§েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻŦা āĻšিāĻ¨্āĻĻু āĻŦা āĻ্āĻ°ীāĻ¸্āĻাāĻ¨ āĻšāĻŦ?āĻāĻ° āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে(āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨেāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻ°া āĻšāĻ˛ āĻ¨া) āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻে āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻে āĻāĻ িāĻ¨ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤ি। āĻ¤াāĻ°āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻĒāĻ°āĻাāĻ˛ে āĻ¤ āĻূāĻ্āĻ¤āĻোāĻীāĻ,āĻāĻšāĻাāĻ˛েāĻ āĻূāĻ্āĻ¤āĻোāĻী।āĻāĻ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻ¸্āĻĨা āĻেāĻ¨ো?āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ°ে। āĻ¨াāĻি āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻ āĻ¯াāĻŦেāĻ¨া?? āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻĨা āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻোāĻ¨ āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨āĻāĻ¤ āĻ āĻŽিāĻ˛ āĻĨাāĻāĻŦেāĻ। āĻিāĻাāĻŦে?!! āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ āĻāĻĨা। āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻ¤াāĻে āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻীāĻŦāĻ¨āĻ¸āĻ্āĻী āĻšিāĻ¸াāĻŦে āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻŦাāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨া(āĻĒāĻ°িāĻŦাāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻĒাāĻā§া āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇা)। āĻ¤াāĻ°āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻে। āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻāĻে āĻি āĻ¯েāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻ¨াāĻ?āĻ¨াāĻি āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ āĻāĻিāĻ¤ ??
āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻ¸াāĻ°ী āĻāĻা āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°িāĻ¨া।āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻāĻ˛ে āĻāĻŽি āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ী āĻ¨া। āĻাāĻ°āĻ¨ āĻāĻŽি āĻিāĻু āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻļাāĻ¸āĻ¨ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻ°িāĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻŽি āĻাāĻ āĻĒুāĻ°োāĻĒুāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻāĻা āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻŦে???
ReplyDelete@āĻĢাāĻ˛āĻ¤ু,
ReplyDeleteWhy are you trying to buy what others are trying to sell? Life is long and every people have their own philosophy. We learn from our mistakes. See good and truth is not always welcome. So if you are not welcome on some very good visions of you don't be disappointed. They killed socrates for his wisdom really!
So hold on to your own belief. Day by day your mind grows up and you know better. It's better to have own judgement and knowledge than being blindly followed by.
The world is amorphous and no-one really knows everything. So don't worry.
At least you got to touch the reality that should make you feel better.
Happy hunting.
[Never mind. I wrote in English to make the access easier for international users.]
āĻāĻŽি āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤ি āĻাāĻāĻি, āĻোāĻ¨ āĻĻিāĻāĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻĻেāĻļāĻ¨া āĻ¨ā§। āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻ¨িāĻ°ীāĻ্āĻˇāĻŖেāĻ° āĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻŽিāĻ āĻ িāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻŦ āĻি āĻāĻ°া āĻāĻিāĻ¤ āĻāĻŽাāĻ°।
ReplyDeleteāĻāĻŽি āĻĒাāĻ°িāĻŦাāĻ°িāĻāĻাāĻŦেāĻ āĻŽুāĻ্āĻ¤āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤া āĻāĻ°্āĻাāĻ° āĻ¸ুāĻ¯োāĻ āĻĒেā§েāĻি। āĻ¤āĻĨাāĻāĻĨিāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ-āĻāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§িāĻ¤াā§ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻ āĻ¨ীāĻšা āĻāĻে।āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻিāĻāĻ°্āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻ āĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ¤্āĻ¤্āĻŦে āĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻ¨াāĻ।
āĻĢাāĻ˛āĻ¤ু āĻাāĻ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻšā§ āĻĻিāĻ āĻ¨িāĻĻāĻ°্āĻļāĻ¨ āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻা āĻāĻāĻ¨ো āĻŦুāĻে āĻāĻ েāĻ¨ āĻ¨াāĻ। āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨ āĻিāĻ˛
ReplyDelete"āĻ¸েāĻা āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻŦে?" āĻāĻāĻা āĻšāĻ˛ āĻĻিāĻ āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻĻেāĻļāĻ¨া āĻাāĻā§া। āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤েāĻ¨,
"āĻ¸েāĻা āĻেāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻŦ(āĻ¨া)?" āĻ¸েāĻা āĻšāĻ¤ āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¨েāĻˇāĻŖ। āĻ¸ুāĻ¤āĻ°াং āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻāĻে āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ āĻেāĻŦে āĻĻেāĻেāĻ¨ āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛ে āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻি āĻাāĻ্āĻেāĻ¨। āĻ¤াāĻাā§া āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻļুāĻ¨ে āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻšāĻ˛ো āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻāĻ§া-āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ। āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻāĻ¨āĻĢিāĻāĻ¸āĻĄ। āĻ¸েāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻĻিāĻāĻ¨িāĻĻāĻ°্āĻļāĻ¨ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°ā§োāĻāĻ¨
āĻ¸ুāĻ¸্āĻĒāĻ¸্āĻāĻ¤াāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¨্āĻ¤āĻŦ্āĻ¯ে āĻ¯ে āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻিāĻ˛
ReplyDelete(āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻ¸াāĻ°ী āĻāĻা āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°িāĻ¨া।āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻāĻ˛ে āĻāĻŽি āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ী āĻ¨া। āĻাāĻ°āĻ¨ āĻāĻŽি āĻিāĻু āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻļাāĻ¸āĻ¨ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻ°িāĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻŽি āĻাāĻ āĻĒুāĻ°োāĻĒুāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻāĻা āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻŦে???)
āĻ¸েāĻা āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¨āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া।
Sorry for being so late because of day-long work. :)
ReplyDelete“You shouldn't had left your research. You got a point that patched with a fatwa.”
LOLz… When you can’t answer to a logical argument, just label it as ‘fatwa’!!! Rather than emotionally calling it a ‘patched fatwa’, try to logically refute the arguments if you can. ;)
“Leaving the strong points for refuting with google is really disappointing..”
Yep. That’s why I already gave my proposal beforehand – put forth a point you think to be ‘strong’ and then let’s see it. It seems that you think the ‘slavery’ (and other) issues you posed in your post to be some ‘strong’ points. Fine. Let’s see those then.
The questions 1 to 4 and 6 – all the 5 questions are answered in details at the following link:
http://public.sharafat.co.cc/home/islaam_and_slavery.html
If you don’t have enough time to go through all of it, for your convenience, I’ve colored and bold-faced a small portion of it. You can first study those. If you don’t feel being convinced, then I’m sorry but you have no choice other than studying the topic in full. And of course, don’t forget to mention anything from that document which you can refute.
ā§Ģ 'āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻাāĻ˛েāĻ°, āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻ¯ুāĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻŦিāĻৃāĻ¤āĻাāĻŦে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯' āĻāĻŦং 'āĻ āĻāĻ¯়াāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻ¯িāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻĻাāĻ¸ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻিāĻ˛ো, āĻ¸ে āĻĒāĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻĨাāĻা āĻāĻ¸েāĻিāĻ˛ো' - āĻāĻĻুāĻি āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯় āĻি?
Of course these two wordings are contradictory. But the fact is, Islaam never says that slavery was only for the ancient period, rather it’s for all periods. For details, see the above link.
ā§ 'āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸া. āĻāĻ° āĻāĻĨা-āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻāĻŖেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻāĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়, āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻ¸āĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়' āĻ 'āĻ āĻšুāĻুāĻŽ āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ°āĻ āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯, āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¨āĻ¯়'- āĻāĻĻুāĻিāĻ āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯়?
Nope. Take an example. Suppose a teacher says to his class – “this rule is applicable to all of you. However, it’s not applicable to students X and Y because of such and such.” Is there any problem? If you make it clear which rulings are for all people and which are for a few particular people, then where is the contradiction??
ā§ āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš(āĻŦাāĻ˛্āĻ¯ āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš ) āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻ°āĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ো āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ো? āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸. āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻļেāĻˇ (āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšāĻৃāĻ¤) āĻ¸্āĻ¤্āĻ°ী āĻŦিāĻŦি āĻāĻ¯়েāĻļা āĻ°া. āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ (āĻ¤িāĻ¨ি āĻ¨āĻŦীāĻীāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦাāĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇা āĻĒ্āĻ°িāĻ¯়āĻ āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻাāĻ¨া āĻ¯াāĻ¯়) āĻāĻāĻে āĻāĻ āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻেāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻāĻ˛ে, āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻি āĻāĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦে?
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, what do you mean by āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা ? Is it just the prior time of the natural age of puberty? Or is it the ‘human-defined’ prior time of 18 years??
Let’s consider the case that you meant the natural age of puberty. Now, the fact is – the marriage CONTRACT between Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and ‘Aishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) was done before she reached puberty. However, the CONSUMMATION of marriage was done AFTER she reached puberty. So, Islaam never prohibits to simply contract marriage before puberty. Rather it prohibits the consummation of marriage before puberty.
About your mentioned lalon’s song and similarly Nazrul’s poem – I don’t understand songs and poems well. However, I think the mentioned song and poem are not that difficult to understand. Just mentioning one line from the song (actually the summary line): “āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻ°āĻিāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ¨ি, āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻ°āĻিāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ¨ি āĻ˛াāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻĢāĻিāĻ° āĻāĻ¯়!”. If that’s the case, then I’d say: Lalon is saying that what HE knows is that religions are made by people. However, what I (and billions of people other than me) know is that Islaam and Quraan has been revealed from Allaah the Almighty. Have any doubt? Then let’s share it. :)
Now some words for “Faltu”...
ReplyDelete“āĻ¸েāĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°াāĻীāĻ¨āĻাāĻ˛ āĻĨেāĻে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ¨া āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ¸ংāĻেāĻ°/āĻোāĻ¤্āĻ°েāĻ° āĻ āĻ§ীāĻ¨ে āĻĨাāĻে āĻļুāĻ§ুāĻŽাāĻ¤্āĻ° āĻিāĻু āĻŦাā§āĻ¤ি āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻĒাāĻā§াāĻ° āĻāĻļাā§। āĻ¸েāĻ āĻĻিāĻ āĻĨেāĻে āĻŦিāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ে āĻ¤ āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻĻাঁā§াā§ āĻāĻŽি āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻāĻা āĻĻাāĻŦি āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ে āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¸াāĻšাāĻ¯্āĻ¯ āĻĒেāĻ¤ে āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া। āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻি āĻāĻŽি āĻিāĻু āĻŦাā§āĻ¤ি āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻāĻĻাā§েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻŦা āĻšিāĻ¨্āĻĻু āĻŦা āĻ্āĻ°ীāĻ¸্āĻাāĻ¨ āĻšāĻŦ?”
Ask your common sense, you’ll definitely get the correct answer.
“āĻāĻ° āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে(āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨেāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻ°া āĻšāĻ˛ āĻ¨া) āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻে āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻে āĻāĻ িāĻ¨ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤ি।“
āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻ°āĻāĻŽ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻā§াāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻাāĻ¨ি āĻ¨া āĻ¯েāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻুāĻ°āĻāĻ¨-āĻšাāĻĻীāĻ¸ে āĻŦাāĻ°āĻŦাāĻ° āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে “āĻĻāĻ˛াāĻĻāĻ˛ি” āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻি āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻšুঁāĻļিā§াāĻ° āĻāĻ°া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻŽুāĻ°āĻ¤াāĻĻ āĻ¤āĻĨা āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽāĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛, āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨ āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻ¯ে, āĻāĻ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻ¸্āĻĨা āĻেāĻ¨? āĻুāĻŦ āĻ¸ংāĻ্āĻˇেāĻĒে āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻĻেāĻ (āĻāĻ¤āĻ্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻাāĻāĻĒ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻāĻ° āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ˛াāĻāĻে āĻ¨া)। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ্āĻা āĻšāĻŦে, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻ¨িāĻŦা, āĻāĻ° āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ্āĻা āĻāĻ°āĻŦে, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻŦেāĻ° āĻšā§ে āĻিā§ে āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¨াāĻŽে āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻ āĻĒāĻŦাāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻŦা āĻāĻ° āĻĻুāĻ°্āĻ¨াāĻŽ āĻ°āĻাāĻŦা, āĻāĻা āĻ¤ো āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĻেāĻā§া āĻ¯াā§ āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻ āĻ¨া? āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ¨া āĻ˛াāĻāĻ˛ে āĻŦāĻāĻ˛ো, āĻĒāĻ°ে āĻŦিāĻ¸্āĻ¤াāĻ°িāĻ¤ āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻ¯া āĻāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨ে, āĻāĻ¨āĻļা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš।
“āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ°ে। āĻ¨াāĻি āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻ āĻ¯াāĻŦেāĻ¨া??”
āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸āĻŦāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻŽāĻ¤াāĻŽāĻ¤āĻ āĻ¯ৌāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻšā§। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে, āĻাāĻ¨āĻাঁāĻ°āĻĒুāĻ˛ āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¨ীāĻ˛āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤ āĻ¯াāĻā§া āĻ¯াā§ āĻেāĻŽāĻ¨ে, āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻেāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻļāĻšীāĻĻ āĻŽিāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻĻিā§ে āĻ¯াāĻ, āĻেāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻŦাংāĻ˛া āĻāĻাāĻĄেāĻŽীāĻ° āĻĒাāĻļ āĻĻিā§ে, āĻেāĻāĻŦা āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻŦুā§েāĻেāĻ° āĻĒাāĻļ āĻĻিā§ে। āĻāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻ¸āĻŦাāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻāĻ āĻ¯ৌāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻāĻŦং āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖāĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻŽāĻ¤āĻেāĻĻ āĻšā§ āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻি āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ¸েāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻŽāĻ¤āĻেāĻĻāĻা āĻāĻĻৌ āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖāĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯ āĻ¨ā§। āĻāĻা āĻ āĻ¤্āĻ¯āĻ¨্āĻ¤ āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻĒূāĻ°্āĻŖāĻাāĻŦে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻŽাāĻŖ āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াā§ āĻ¯ে, āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻ¨া āĻāĻ āĻŽāĻ¤āĻাāĻ āĻ¸āĻ িāĻ āĻāĻŦং āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯āĻা āĻুāĻ˛।
“āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻĨা āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻোāĻ¨ āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨āĻāĻ¤ āĻ āĻŽিāĻ˛ āĻĨাāĻāĻŦেāĻ। āĻিāĻাāĻŦে?!! āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ āĻāĻĨা। āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻ¤াāĻে āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻীāĻŦāĻ¨āĻ¸āĻ্āĻী āĻšিāĻ¸াāĻŦে āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻŦাāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨া(āĻĒāĻ°িāĻŦাāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻĒাāĻā§া āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇা)। āĻ¤াāĻ°āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻে।“
āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖেāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻ¤ো āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻাāĻŦিāĻ। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻāĻ āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻি āĻāĻŽāĻ°া āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻĻুāĻ āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻāĻ¤ে āĻ¨া āĻĒাāĻ°াāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻĒāĻ°িāĻ¸্āĻĨিāĻ¤ি āĻ¤ৈāĻ°ি āĻāĻ°āĻŦ? āĻোāĻĻ āĻুāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻেāĻ¨ে āĻ¨াāĻ: “āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻ°ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ি āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦāĻ¸āĻ¤āĻŦাā§ি āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¤াā§িā§ে āĻĻেā§ āĻ¨ি, āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ্āĻে āĻ¸āĻĻ্āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻŦং āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻ¤াāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¨িāĻˇেāĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¨ি; āĻ¨িāĻļ্āĻā§ āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ¨। āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻ°ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻে āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦāĻ¸āĻ¤āĻŦাā§ি āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¤াā§িā§ে āĻĻিā§েāĻে āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻŦāĻšিāĻˇ্āĻাāĻ°েāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻĒৃāĻˇ্āĻ āĻĒোāĻˇāĻāĻ¤া āĻāĻ°েāĻে, āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ুāĻ¤্āĻŦ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¨িāĻˇেāĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻেāĻ¨। āĻāĻ° āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ুāĻ¤্āĻŦ āĻāĻ°āĻŦে, āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻ¤ো āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ āĻ¤্āĻ¯াāĻাāĻ°ী।“ (āĻ¸ূāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻŽāĻ¤াāĻšিāĻ¨াāĻš ā§Ŧā§Ļ:ā§Ž-ā§¯) āĻ¸ুāĻ¤āĻ°াং, āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°āĻে āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻাāĻ°াāĻĒ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¤ো āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§āĻ āĻ¨ি, āĻāĻĒāĻ°āĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻাāĻ˛ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻŦং āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖ āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻ¤āĻ¸াāĻš āĻĻেāĻā§া āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻāĻ āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¯ে, āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻাāĻ°ীāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ¨।
“āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻāĻে āĻি āĻ¯েāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻ¨াāĻ?āĻ¨াāĻি āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ āĻāĻিāĻ¤ ??”
ReplyDeleteāĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ āĻি āĻāĻিāĻ¤?? āĻāĻা āĻĄিāĻĒেāĻ¨্āĻĄ āĻāĻ°ে। āĻ¯ে āĻাāĻ¨ে, āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে āĻাāĻ¨ে āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻি āĻ¸āĻŽাāĻ¨? āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇāĻāĻāĻŖ āĻি āĻ্āĻ˛াāĻ¸ে āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ¸্āĻুāĻĄেāĻ¨্āĻ āĻāĻ° āĻাāĻ°াāĻĒ āĻ¸্āĻুāĻĄেāĻ¨্āĻāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¨া? āĻŦāĻ°ং āĻĒā§েāĻ¨্āĻāĻা āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻ¯ে, āĻāĻ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻāĻে āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇāĻāĻāĻŖ āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻেāĻ¨। āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻĒāĻ° āĻাāĻ°াāĻĒ āĻ¸্āĻুāĻĄেāĻ¨্āĻāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ āĻŦāĻ্āĻাāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻুঁā§ে āĻĢেāĻ˛ে āĻ¨া āĻĻিā§ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻুāĻ˛ āĻāĻ°া āĻŦিāĻˇā§āĻুāĻ˛ো āĻাāĻ˛ āĻāĻ°ে āĻŦুāĻাāĻ¨োāĻ° āĻেāĻˇ্āĻা āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻ āĻŽāĻ্āĻāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨে, āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ āĻšāĻŦে āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦোāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻŽ āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇāĻāĻ¤া। āĻāĻ° āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇāĻ āĻāĻ¤ āĻিāĻু āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°āĻ āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ āĻ¸্āĻুāĻĄেāĻ¨্āĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¯ে, āĻ¨া, āĻāĻŽি āĻাāĻ˛ āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻāĻ˛ে āĻ āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇāĻেāĻ° āĻ¤াāĻে āĻā§িā§ে āĻāĻ˛া āĻাā§া āĻāĻ¤ি āĻĨাāĻāĻŦে āĻ¨া। āĻ িāĻ āĻāĻāĻāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¯ে, āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻৃāĻŖা āĻ¨া āĻāĻ°ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤ি āĻĻিā§ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻুāĻ˛āĻুāĻ˛ো āĻŦুāĻাāĻ। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻĒāĻ°āĻ āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻĒ্āĻ°ুāĻĢ āĻĒাāĻā§াāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°āĻ āĻোāĻ° āĻāĻ°ে āĻŽাāĻ¨āĻ¤ে āĻ¨া āĻাā§, āĻ¤াāĻāĻ˛ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻā§িā§ে āĻāĻ˛া āĻাā§া āĻāĻ° āĻী-āĻ āĻŦা āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻে। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻāĻ°āĻĒāĻ°āĻ āĻ¤াāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§ āĻāĻ°াāĻাāĻে āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ¨িāĻˇেāĻ§ āĻāĻ°āĻে – āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻāĻ্āĻ°āĻŽāĻŖ āĻāĻ°ে, āĻ¤াāĻāĻ˛ে āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻ°া āĻ āĻŦāĻļ্āĻ¯āĻ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻৃāĻŖা āĻāĻ°āĻŦে āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ্āĻ°āĻŽāĻŖ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤িāĻšāĻ¤ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻ¸্āĻĨা āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖ āĻāĻ°āĻŦে।
“āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻ¸াāĻ°ী āĻāĻা āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°িāĻ¨া।āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻāĻ˛ে āĻāĻŽি āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ী āĻ¨া। āĻাāĻ°āĻ¨ āĻāĻŽি āĻিāĻু āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻļাāĻ¸āĻ¨ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻ°িāĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻŽি āĻাāĻ āĻĒুāĻ°োāĻĒুāĻ°ি āĻিāĻু āĻāĻāĻা āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻŦে???”
āĻুāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻŽāĻ¤āĻাāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨। āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯া āĻাāĻ্āĻ, āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻে āĻ¸āĻŽā§ āĻāĻŦং āĻļ্āĻ°āĻŽ āĻĻুāĻোāĻ āĻĻিāĻ¤ে āĻšāĻŦে (āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻ°েāĻ – āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¯āĻে āĻাāĻ¨āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ, āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻে āĻ āĻŦāĻļ্āĻ¯āĻ āĻĒāĻ°িāĻļ্āĻ°āĻŽ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻšāĻŦে)। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤্āĻ¯েāĻ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° (āĻāĻŦং āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻāĻ¤াāĻŦাāĻĻীāĻĻেāĻ°āĻ) āĻĒāĻŖ্āĻĄিāĻ¤āĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ° – ā§§. āĻেāĻ¨ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¯ে, āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻŽেāĻ¨ে āĻāĻ˛া āĻāĻিāĻ¤? ā§¨. āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯াāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻী āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻāĻŦং āĻেāĻ¨? āĻāĻŦাāĻ° āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻāĻ āĻĻুāĻি āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ° āĻĒেā§ে āĻ¯াāĻŦা, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻāĻŦাāĻ°āĻ āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻĒāĻŖ্āĻĄিāĻ¤āĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ° – āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯াāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻĒāĻŖ্āĻĄিāĻ¤āĻāĻŖ āĻ¤ো āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻŦং āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻāĻ āĻāĻ āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻেāĻ¨। āĻāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻāĻĨাāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻŦāĻ্āĻ¤āĻŦ্āĻ¯ āĻী? āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻ¸, āĻāĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻ āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻāĻĨোāĻĒāĻāĻĨāĻ¨েāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻŦেāĻ-āĻŦুāĻĻ্āĻ§ি āĻĒ্āĻ°ā§োāĻ āĻāĻ°ে āĻ¸িāĻĻ্āĻ§াāĻ¨্āĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻ āĻ¯ে, āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻী āĻāĻ°āĻŦা। āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻĒāĻ্āĻˇ āĻĨেāĻে āĻ āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻāĻাāĻ āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦোāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻŽ āĻĒāĻ°াāĻŽāĻ°্āĻļ। āĻāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻŽ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻĒāĻ°াāĻŽāĻ°্āĻļ āĻেāĻ āĻেāĻ¨ে āĻĨাāĻāĻ˛ে āĻ¤াāĻে āĻāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻ¸েāĻা āĻ āĻŦāĻļ্āĻ¯āĻ āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻ°োāĻ§ āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻে।
āĻ¸āĻŦāĻļেāĻˇে āĻāĻŽি āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦ (āĻ¯āĻĻিāĻ āĻāĻ¤িāĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯েāĻ āĻŦāĻšুāĻŦাāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤্āĻ¯āĻ্āĻˇ-āĻĒāĻ°োāĻ্āĻˇāĻাāĻŦে āĻāĻা āĻāĻŽি āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻি): āĻ¸্āĻ°āĻˇ্āĻা āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻে āĻāĻāĻি āĻŦ্āĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻĻিā§েāĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¯েāĻাāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖেāĻ āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻিāĻ° āĻ¸েāĻ°া āĻীāĻŦ। āĻāĻ āĻŦ্āĻ°েāĻ¨āĻাāĻে āĻ¨িāĻ°āĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇāĻাāĻŦে āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤ি-āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻŽাāĻŖ āĻĒāĻ°্āĻ¯াāĻ˛োāĻāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻাāĻে āĻ˛াāĻাāĻ। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻĒāĻ°āĻাāĻ˛ে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ° āĻ¨া-āĻ āĻāĻ°, āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¤āĻ¤āĻĒāĻ্āĻˇে āĻāĻ āĻীāĻŦāĻ¨ে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ°েāĻ¨āĻāĻ°্āĻা āĻ¨িঃāĻ¸āĻ¨্āĻĻেāĻšে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻাāĻ°ে āĻāĻ¸āĻŦে – āĻāĻ¤ে āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ¨্āĻĻেāĻšāĻ āĻ¨াāĻ।
āĻāĻ¤ āĻĄিāĻেāĻāĻ˛āĻ¸ āĻ˛েāĻাāĻ˛েāĻি āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻ āĻ্āĻ¯াāĻ¸ āĻ¨াāĻ, āĻ§ৈāĻ°্āĻ¯āĻ āĻ¨াāĻ। āĻ¯াāĻšোāĻ,
ReplyDeleteāĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨāĻŽেāĻ āĻĢাāĻ˛āĻ¤ু āĻাāĻā§েāĻ° āĻ¸ুāĻ¸্āĻĒāĻˇ্āĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ° āĻĻিāĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ,
āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻŦāĻ¸্āĻĨাāĻ¨ে āĻāĻে āĻāĻাāĻে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§ Agnostic (not Atheist)। āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ āĻ¤্āĻŽāĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻšā§ে āĻĨাāĻে āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇāĻে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻļ্āĻ¯ে āĻাāĻ¨াāĻ¨োāĻ° āĻĻāĻ°āĻাāĻ° āĻিāĻ˛ āĻ¨া, āĻ¯েāĻšেāĻ¤ু āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻļ্āĻ¯েāĻ āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ°েāĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¸ুāĻ¤āĻ°াং āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻ¨িāĻ্āĻি āĻāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻĻিāĻ āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻĻেāĻļāĻ¨াāĻ āĻাāĻ্āĻেāĻ¨(āĻ āĻ°্āĻĨাā§ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°াāĻŽāĻ°্āĻļ)। āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¨িāĻে āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻŦুāĻāĻ¤ে āĻĒেāĻ°েāĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¯ে āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻļাāĻ¸āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻ˛āĻেāĻ¨, āĻ¸ুāĻ¤āĻ°াং āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻ¨িāĻ্āĻি āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻ¯āĻĨেāĻˇ্āĻ āĻ˛āĻিāĻাāĻ˛ি āĻāĻŦং āĻ¨িāĻ°āĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇāĻ¤াāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻāĻুāĻ্āĻেāĻ¨ (āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ˛াāĻāĻ˛ো)। āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻাāĻে āĻĢেāĻāĻ āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻšā§ āĻāĻŦং āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻিāĻāĻ°্āĻ¤া āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻĨাāĻে āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻŦāĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻাāĻ āĻি āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦাāĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇা āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨āĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯ āĻ¨ā§? āĻাāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻĒāĻ¨ি āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇāĻে āĻ¸āĻŽাāĻ¨ āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸āĻ¤ে āĻļিāĻāĻŦেāĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻĒৃāĻĨিāĻŦী āĻšā§ে āĻāĻ āĻŦে āĻ¤āĻĨাāĻāĻĨিāĻ¤ āĻ¸্āĻŦāĻ°্āĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤। āĻāĻাāĻ āĻ¨িāĻļ্āĻāĻ āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻ্āĻাāĻ¨ী,āĻĒāĻ°āĻŽ āĻāĻ°ুāĻ¨াāĻŽā§, āĻĒāĻ°āĻŽ āĻĻā§াāĻ˛ু āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻিāĻāĻ°্āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻোāĻে āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§ āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ° āĻ¤ো āĻāĻāĻু āĻেāĻŦে āĻĻেāĻāĻ˛ে, āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ āĻুāĻে āĻĒেāĻ¤েāĻ¨।
āĻĻ্āĻŦিāĻ¤ীā§āĻ¤ āĻŽোāĻ˛্āĻ˛া āĻ¸াāĻ°াāĻĢাāĻ¤,
āĻ¯ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§ āĻ¤া āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻাāĻে āĻāĻ¨োāĻĻিāĻ¨ো āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨ীā§ āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻ¨া। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻĻোāĻ¯āĻেāĻ° āĻā§েāĻ āĻšোāĻ āĻāĻ° āĻŦেāĻšেāĻ¸্āĻ¤েāĻ° āĻেāĻ˛āĻŽাāĻ¨āĻĻেāĻ° āĻ˛োāĻেāĻ āĻšোāĻāĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨। āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে āĻāĻĄ āĻ¨িāĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨেāĻ°/āĻĻাāĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¤েāĻ°/āĻāĻŦাāĻĻāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ¤ āĻিāĻু āĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻĄেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ¤্āĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ো āĻĒ্āĻ°ā§োāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦোāĻ§ āĻāĻ°ি āĻ¨া।
"āĻ¯ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§ āĻ¤া āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻাāĻে āĻāĻ¨োāĻĻিāĻ¨ো āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻ¨ীā§ āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻ¨া। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻĻোāĻ¯āĻেāĻ° āĻā§েāĻ āĻšোāĻ āĻāĻ° āĻŦেāĻšেāĻ¸্āĻ¤েāĻ° āĻেāĻ˛āĻŽাāĻ¨āĻĻেāĻ° āĻ˛োāĻেāĻ āĻšোāĻāĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨। āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে āĻāĻĄ āĻ¨িāĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨেāĻ°/āĻĻাāĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¤েāĻ°/āĻāĻŦাāĻĻāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ¤ āĻিāĻু āĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻĄেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ¤্āĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ো āĻĒ্āĻ°ā§োāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦোāĻ§ āĻāĻ°ি āĻ¨া।"
ReplyDeleteāĻŽুāĻে āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ িāĻāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ "āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛" āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻ¸āĻŽাāĻ¨। āĻ āĻĨāĻ āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦাāĻাāĻ˛ি āĻāĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻংāĻ°েāĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°। āĻীāĻাāĻŦে? āĻাāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦাংāĻ˛াā§ āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ°েāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻংāĻ°েāĻিāĻ¤ে। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻāĻ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻāĻাāĻে āĻি āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨āĻে āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ° āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨āĻে āĻৃāĻŖা āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻাāĻে āĻ˛াāĻাāĻŦা?? āĻāĻŽি āĻী āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ্āĻি āĻŦুāĻāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻ? "āĻাāĻˇাāĻāĻ¤" āĻ āĻ°্āĻĨে āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯েāĻোāĻ¨ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯েāĻ āĻ¤ো āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻŦা - āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¨িāĻļ্āĻā§āĻ āĻĨিāĻ¸িāĻ¸ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽā§ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻেāĻˇ্āĻা āĻāĻ°āĻŦা āĻ¯ে, āĻাāĻ°া āĻ āĻĨিāĻ¸িāĻ¸েāĻ° āĻāĻĒিāĻ āĻাāĻ˛ āĻাāĻ¨ে āĻāĻ° āĻাāĻ°া āĻ¯াāĻ¨ে āĻ¨া āĻāĻŦং āĻ¸েāĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻ¯ে āĻাāĻ¨ে, āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻাāĻেāĻ āĻĻৌā§াāĻŦা। āĻāĻ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻĒাāĻ°āĻĢেāĻ্āĻāĻ˛ি āĻāĻে। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻāĻ°েāĻāĻāĻ¨āĻে āĻ¨িāĻু āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻা āĻŦুāĻাāĻŦা, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻেāĻাāĻ˛। āĻ¯ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§ āĻ¤া āĻāĻāĻ¨োāĻ āĻাāĻ°ো āĻাāĻেāĻ āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖীā§ āĻšā§ āĻ¨া। āĻāĻ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ āĻ°্āĻĨে? āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻāĻা āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°েāĻāĻāĻ¨āĻে "āĻĻেāĻāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ি āĻ¨া āĻ¤োāĻ°ে" āĻাāĻāĻĒ āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖেāĻ° āĻĻিāĻে āĻ¨িā§ে āĻ¯াā§। āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻāĻāĻ¨োāĻ āĻāĻ āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻŽোāĻĻāĻ¨ āĻĻেā§ āĻ¨া। āĻāĻ āĻĻুāĻ āĻ§āĻ°āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻেāĻĻাāĻেāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻĻাāĻšāĻ°āĻŖāĻ¸āĻš āĻāĻ° āĻāĻেāĻ āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻ¯া āĻāĻ°েāĻি। āĻāĻŦাāĻ°ো āĻāĻেāĻ° āĻĒোāĻ¸্āĻāĻা āĻĻেāĻে āĻ¨াāĻ।
"āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে āĻāĻĄ āĻ¨িāĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨেāĻ°/āĻĻাāĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¤েāĻ°/āĻāĻŦাāĻĻāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ¤ āĻিāĻু āĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻ°্āĻĨāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻĄেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ¤্āĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ো āĻĒ্āĻ°ā§োāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦোāĻ§ āĻāĻ°ি āĻ¨া।"
ReplyDeleteāĻ āĻāĻĨাāĻাāĻ āĻāĻ° āĻāĻেāĻ āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻ¯া āĻāĻ°েāĻি। āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻāĻŦাāĻĻāĻ¤েāĻ°āĻ āĻŽুāĻাāĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇী āĻ¨ā§। āĻ¸াāĻ°া āĻĻুāĻ¨িā§াāĻ° āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻিāĻুāĻ āĻ¨া āĻāĻ°ে, āĻ¤াāĻ¤েāĻ āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻিāĻুāĻ āĻ¯াā§-āĻāĻ¸ে āĻ¨া। āĻŦāĻ°ং āĻ¤িāĻ¨ি āĻāĻŦাāĻĻāĻ¤ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻেāĻ¨ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ্āĻāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯āĻ। āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻ¨া āĻšā§, āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻুāĻŦ āĻোāĻ্āĻ āĻāĻāĻা āĻāĻĻাāĻšāĻ°āĻŖ āĻĻেāĻ। āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻāĻ¯ূ āĻāĻ°ে āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯ āĻĒā§āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻেāĻ¨। āĻেāĻ¨? āĻļāĻ¤ āĻļāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻে, āĻŽাāĻ¤্āĻ° āĻā§েāĻāĻা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻি:
ā§§. āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯ āĻĒā§াāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ āĻĻিā§ে āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻļিāĻāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻিāĻাāĻŦে āĻ¸āĻŽā§েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻĻ্āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻšā§।
ā§¨. āĻাāĻŽাāĻ¤ে āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯ āĻĒā§াāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ āĻĻিā§ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে-āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§āĻ¨ āĻĻৃā§ āĻšā§।
ā§Š. āĻĻিāĻ¨ে ā§Ģ āĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻ¯ূ āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻļāĻ°ীāĻ°ে āĻāĻāĻ¨ো āĻŽā§āĻ˛া āĻāĻŽāĻŦে āĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻেā§াāĻ˛ āĻāĻ°ে āĻĻেāĻ: āĻ¯েāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻাā§āĻাā§ āĻ§ূāĻ˛া-āĻŦাāĻ˛ি āĻāĻŽে, āĻāĻ¯ূāĻ¤ে āĻ¸েāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻাā§āĻাāĻ āĻ§ুāĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§।
ā§Ē. āĻāĻāĻু āĻĒāĻ°āĻĒāĻ° āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻŽুāĻে āĻĒাāĻ¨ি āĻ˛াāĻাāĻŦা, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻĢ্āĻ°েāĻļ āĻ˛াāĻāĻŦে।
āĻŽāĻাāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ° āĻšāĻ্āĻে, āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻŽি āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯ āĻĒā§āĻ¤াāĻŽ āĻ¨া, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻাāĻে āĻেāĻŦāĻ˛ āĻĨিāĻāĻ°ী āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻšāĻ¤। āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻŽি āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ āĻāĻ° āĻ¸ুāĻĢāĻ˛ āĻĒাāĻ। āĻāĻে āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ¨োāĻ¯োāĻ āĻĻিā§ে āĻাāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ˛ীāĻ¨ āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽā§ āĻšāĻ¤, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻাāĻ āĻĢেāĻ˛ে āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯ āĻĒā§āĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻ°āĻ্āĻ¤ āĻ˛াāĻāĻ¤। āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻŽ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻ¸্āĻ¤āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻ¨াāĻŽাāĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽā§ āĻšā§, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻুāĻŦ āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ˛াāĻে - āĻ¯াāĻ, āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¤āĻ¤ ā§§ā§Ģ/ā§¨ā§Ļ āĻŽিāĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻāĻু āĻŦ্āĻ°েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ্āĻি।
āĻŽোāĻ āĻāĻĨা, āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻিāĻ¯োāĻāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻāĻ¨āĻ, āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻāĻāĻ¨োāĻ āĻ¸েāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻাāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¨া। āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻ°ো āĻোāĻ¨ āĻāĻ¨āĻĢিāĻāĻļāĻ¨ āĻĨাāĻāĻ˛ে āĻাāĻ¨াāĻ¨োāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ¨াāĻ্āĻি।
>> It doesn’t require mess of religions to understand what right is and what wrong is!
ReplyDelete>Might be somewhat true. But, people still won't choose to do the right. They would always run for evil. Then, how would you come up with a way to establish the right and prevent the wrong? Wait, you don't need to take time to think about it. Religion already provides these guidelines...
“A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.” -- Albert Einstein
Einstein is not only a great scientist he was also an eminent social reformer and educationist, you should have known that.
>> Stand for mankind not for religion.
> Religion IS for mankind. It never goes against mankind. It's the mankind who uses religion for satisfying their selfish needs. The blame is to be given not to religion, rather to those selfish people.
Religion is guilty that’s what I explained.
>> I hope you know how badly affected the civilization is by the religion politics.
> Again, religion is not to be blamed for it, rather the people should be.
Yes people who created religions for interests except for Buddhism which is a philosophy not an imposting religion with lies.
>> Debashis wrote: We bribe the god by praying (something like giving TEL(oil)) to get advantages in real life or life after death(!!!).
> Yeah - from people's point of view. God is such a fool that he can't even understand that the people (whom He created) are 'bribing' Him to get advantages!!! He doesn't even care if we don't do what He wants us to do. He needn't care whether we get advantages or are deprived of advantages. He just prescribed religion for our own good....
Sura 2: al-Baqara (The Cow), 2:21
“Allah created the mankind; they should worship Him.”
Contradiction: 3:97, 35:15 say “Allah does not need mankind and the jinns; He is free of
all want.”
What you said is a contradiction in quran. Did you read Quran well?
> Throughout years of research, I found out the truth - not all I "hear" about MY religion are true due to people's ignorance while speaking. But, what I came to find out - all I read in the original texts of MY religion are indeed true and contradiction-free.
ReplyDeleteI said once. Your religion is same way guilty as others and contains a lot lies and contradictions inside. You have seen a lot. Why do you deny?
Nope. They never deserve hell just because of God's decision. God made human the best of creations. Why? Because he gave him something called 'brain' to think logically……... If you don't use your brain to know the right thing and consequently follow the wrong path, shouldn't you deserve punishment?
You got wrong idea. I’ll talk about it more. You owe me thanks for the payback patience I’m giving to you to disabuse you out of religious misconceptions.
>> "How will people be able to think? The poisons of religions are seeded from the very childhood of religious people."
> Again, this is people's fault, not religion's.
Obviously religion is guilty enough.
>> "Forget about the people. Can you think?"
> At least I try to.
No you don’t. Your every thinking is religion-centred even you don’t think neutrally. Your every word is backed from a religion called Islam. When you at first assume the wrong answer as true how will you be able to differentiate true answer from wrong? I am not saying to assume that religion as wrong. At least don’t take it as correct. That’ll be helpfully neutral to start the thinking correctly. God damn if you could ever do that!
You don’t know how much limited you are!
False. Rather I tried my best to find out. The result? At least I didn't find any contradiction in the Quraan and the authentic Prophetic traditions. If you've found one, you're welcome to mention it. :)
I’ve mentioned. The world mentions it so much. Someone is sleeping awake cannot be waked up!
To help you I’ll mention more. But I fear you got a resistive mind you see everything from Islamic perceptions and become fooled by religious scruples! Let’s see how much you can help yourself.
>> "Could ever any religion prevent people from doing wrong?"
> Yeah. During the life of the Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him), Islaam prevented people from doing wrong. You can read any history book mentioning that period for details. It's only one example.
Again misunderstood. Under the hood of religion and costumes bad is still bad good is still good. You need to know the definition of justice from good philosophers. Then you’ll be able to differentiate between good and bad truly. Relgions are so limited!
>> "If you were born in that culture you'd have believed same way. But now you're not coz you are not going to bomb some people tongiht."
> Wrong. Rather I'm not coz I KNOW the right thing from the very religious texts.
You are a fool or what? Does the non-religious people of the roads and pavements know about your religious texts? Think like that. If your words had any effect in real there would have been no people out of your religion! But in real another religion still has the majority! What I wanted to mean is still having the best brain you wouldn’t have been muslim if you were born in Christian society. Like the majority is increasing still being born in their very own religious community.
You might name some Christians who came muslim. I know that much clever you are cycling around your religious garbage. Go to http://www.ex-muslim.org.uk/ you’ll find lakhs of muslims adopted different beliefs. That’s just an example. Reality is more bad for you if your ideas have still not changed.
>> "What Shiya, Sunni dividends? What about differentiated cultures on women?"
ReplyDelete> Again, these are not religion's fault, rather people's. What about contradictions among the scientists about a scientific issue?? You must provide valid proof to justify you're the correct one. Same is true in the above mentioned cases. However, as people are blind and emotional, they don't want to accept proofs. That's why the contradictory views persist. Again, that's not religion's problem.
It’s not true that only your view is correct and all others wrong. You should understand what contradiction means first. A contradiction is not stated just for one person’s emotional case. Religion containing contradictions is not good guideline for mankind.
Is science a religion? Is it imposed on anyone? Science is an established procedure to find the truth. Some concepts might be in development and in future might be proved different, but they are not imposed ever for personal interests in wrong ways. You’re having the very advantages of science like every other people. You shouldn’t believe in religious superstitions.
>> "What if you were not provided any religion from your birth? Then which religion would had been true to you?"
> According to what I've mentioned before, I was a Muslim by birth before; now I'm a Muslim by choice.
No you are wrong. You had 99.99999999..% probability of being Christian. Look at others you of that community. They Christian and they are happy. There are other religion followers too.
>> "If they feel like the order is from their Boss and that came straight from Allah they will not mess with the car but anything definitely? Then who is responsible?"
>The people is responsible. Why would they 'feel' that the order is from their boss? Rather they should 'verify' that the order is indeed from their boss and only then act accordingly. And it's certain that the boss won't order them something wrong to do, isn't it?
You misunderstood. These bosses are religious gurus who provide corrections for incompatible things in your religion and the book, Quran. Not believing them is denying the fundamentals of that religion.
>>"If you were following Christian(or any other religion) strictly still being born in Muslim it might convinced me! But now you are dumb fool follower underestimating others!"
ReplyDelete> …Even Christian priests became Muslims after they sought for the truth and not just stayed as a simple Muslim, rather became scholars in comparing Islaam, Christianity and other religions (and of course, atheism). Were they paid for it or did they do it by making use of their own brain?
You are too biased. You only know the opinion of one party. You don’t know the others’. That’s why you seek brain on accepting Islam. I got people in front of me accept Islaming to whom no religions did matter. The matter was only the help of neighbor muslims. He’d never gave a shit about this religion if he wasn’t seriously troubled being the minority in locality. You find too much truthfulness and intelligence on switching on Islam. You’d understand how fake that is if you were that other religion follower.
Definitely no one ever loves to change his religion/belief because his fellow society, his friends, relatives will leave him. Did you meet a religion switcher? Did you observe their true condition in real life? There is no Allah who made’em happy.
>> About what you said on people with less merit and beasts having better brain than human.
> It seems that you've misunderstood the meaning of "the best of the creations". It refers to the mankind as a whole and not to individual persons. Man can think better than other animals in orders of magnitudes. There is of course differences of level of merit among people, but even the dumbest person can think much more better than any beast.
Should I say you fool again! You didn’t get the logic. Definitely not. There are human beings who are worst than some intelligent beasts in case of intelligence. They are named disabled. I respect them but in your judgement, every people would find Islamic belief from intelligence. They’ll never find.
You think others will go hell. They think you people will be damned to hell. It’s called damnation without relief and etc. I focused on my post in a general statement that makes it easy to understand. But you never get it and you are banging with your own religion.
If you respect your religion too much then you shouldn’t dig it deep here because there are hateful crocodiles inside.
>> "Islam was kind of suitable for primitive times. It's completely worn out!"
ReplyDelete> There is no doubt that many scientific facts which were revealed relatively recently were already mentioned in the Quraan 1400 years ago. Then is it primitive or thousand years advanced?? Rather Islaam is completely compatible with time. Its rulings are formulated in such a way that those would be best suited to current people as well as to those coming later.
That’s fool paradise. Islam never knew science. No joking.. Many erroneous issues have been resolved by religious leader time to time. If you read Quran from first to last you’ll see discussions about those Arab people at that primitive time, places on proximity and related facts on Muhammad. They are related to Muhammad’s life, his hates, his fears and the people, relatives who disobeyed him. There are contradictions about the implementation technique too. I’ll mention if you continue writing your novels. What can you sense from that? Completely written on that time and space. Now it worns out long before.
Not only one book came. There are many kitabs: the Suhuf Ibrahim, the Tawrat, the Zabur, the Injil etc are major. Didn't they came from Allah?
One kitab after another comes because that previous becomes inappropriate with the flow of time, space and race. Same way comes Quran.
Now if a kitab really came from Allah how do they become faulty and inappropriate? There are many contradictions with quranic laws and current phenomenons. Now alims and other so called wise religious people are called to compromise these conflicts..
A book that came from Allah becomes invalidated? And humans decide what should be the modification?
Dig it up. If you have just to come to deny every fact and reason against Islam then I politely say please leave. I haven’t come to make assaults on Islam. My intentions are far from these narrow low-level things.
>>"You are saying something about original text.
>>Allah says: [...] (Al-Hijr 15:9).
>>So don't make us fool telling about your authenticity."
>If I'm not mistaken, you've misunderstood my word "original text". It means the Quraan and the authentic Prophetic traditions. All other books referencing these sources are not considered as original. ………………………. Quraan has been and always will be preserved as it was revealed. Have any proof that it hasn't been? Anybody's welcome to put it forth. :)
Yes, you are mistaken. I said your Allah preserves Quran on his own interest as said. So there cannot be modified copies which in terms stand against this statement.
About all your words where you've tried to say that religion is guilty - you said that you've discussed it and I'm also saying that I've discussed it, too. In this case, the audience would decide whether the statement is correct.
ReplyDelete"Sura 2: al-Baqara (The Cow), 2:21
“Allah created the mankind; they should worship Him.”
Contradiction: 3:97, 35:15 say “Allah does not need mankind and the jinns; He is free of all want.”
What you said is a contradiction in quran. Did you read Quran well?"
Of course I read the Quraan very well (and much better than you did) - to the extent that I learned Arabic just to correct people like you who think themselves to be 'neutral' but yet copy-paste texts from websites without even verifying whether the so-called contradictory aayaat they're copying are indeed meant in the Holy Quraan as they're trying to mean.
Below are the translations of the actual aayaahs in the referred chapter and verse numbers:
2:21. O mankind! Worship your Lord Who created you and those who were before you so that you may become Al-MuttaqÃģn (the pious).
3:97. ...and whoever disbelieves, then AllÃĸh stands not in need of any of the 'AlamÃŽn (mankind and jinns).
35:15. O mankind! it is you who are the needy, but AllÃĸh is Rich (Free of all wants and needs), Worthy of all praise.
This is quite simple English and is clearly comprehendible that Allaah is giving a clear message here that everyone should worship Him so that they become pious. It is not the need of Allaah, but for the good of the mankind as piousness would obviously bring good to people.
Brother, if you want to know the truth, then first of all, be neutral. When you quote something, first check whether that quoted message indeed exists in the reference exactly as you're quoting. You shouldn't blindly copy-paste from websites to suit to your own desires. It's a reprehensible deception.
"Your religion is same way guilty as others and contains a lot lies and contradictions inside. You have seen a lot. Why do you deny?"
ReplyDeleteI deny because I can proof (quite easily) that the claims of existence of those so-called lies and contradictions in Islaam are themselves lies. I already proved quite a few. If you think you're smart enough to refute those, give it a try.
You think that religion is imposed on people. However, Islaam never says to impose it on anybody. Rather surah Kaafiroon (chapter 109) says that if you don't want to come to Islaam, then be with your own religion/view. Islaam is for people's own good. If they don't want it, nobody has the right to force them accepting it. Rather Allaah says in the holy quran (2:256) "There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path."
Brother, before you state something, you should do some research to verify what you're saying is correct.
"I am not saying to assume that religion as wrong. At least don’t take it as correct. That’ll be helpfully neutral to start the thinking correctly. God damn if you could ever do that!"
Yeah, I already mentioned before that I did that long before. I already mentioned before that I started research when I suspected that what people are telling me is not correct. And I know very well how to be neutral to think correctly.
"I said your Allah preserves Quran on his own interest as said. So there cannot be modified copies which in terms stand against this statement."
The Quraan has indeed been preserved without any modification. You're asking about different copies. Tell me, our Bangabandhu gave a historic speech on 7th March; has it been preserved? Of course it is. But it wasn't a written document, it was a speech. Now, if you write in plain bangla and if you write it in Banglish (Bangla text written with English characters which is common in messenger chats), if both of them sound like the original speech when read, then would you say that his speech has been modified because of different copies?? Quraan was revealed as speech, not as a written script. All the copies of Quraan that you think to be 'different' actually sounds exactly the same when they are recited. So, it indeed has been preserved.
You have mentioned many other issues which can be logically refuted very easily. However, as I found out from your last posts that you're in fact not acting neutral, therefore I think that refuting those would only waste my valuable time. By grace of Allaah, I have all the patience, knowledge and expertise needed to clear all your confusions, but first, you must comply to the following:
ReplyDelete1. You must act neutrally and logically (not emotionally). Before you state anything, verify that what you're referencing actually exists in the referenced book.
2. Try to do some research thinking. Rather than copy-pasting the so-called contradictions from websites, try to google for refutations of those contradictions - you're guaranteed to find the answers to all the so-called contradictions on the Internet. Study those; and if, still you find out that those answers can be refuted, then present those contradictions with your refutations. Don't merely utter words without researching even a little bit.
3. Try to be modest. You don't need to call someone fool, dumb, limited etc. to refute his arguments. Smart people need only logical arguments to refute somebody else's arguments. If you can't respect people, don't think they'd thank you just because they owe you to (and it's silly to demand thanks from people or reminding them of owing thanks, anyway...).
4. Try to be honest. If you can't refute my arguments, you should admit that. Don't try to bypass those arguments. You raised some serious objections on contradictions in the Quraan and 'slavery' issue in Islaam. If you can refute my arguments on those issues, then present your arguments. Otherwise, you should admit that the objections you raised were not correct indeed.
So, as I said - adhere to these common-sense rules and I'll have all the patience and time needed to clear all of your confusions, if Allaah wills.
@ Sharafat,
ReplyDelete“āĻāĻ° āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে(āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ্āĻ°āĻ¨্āĻĨেāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻ°া āĻšāĻ˛ āĻ¨া) āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻে āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻে āĻāĻ িāĻ¨ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤ি।“
āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻ°āĻāĻŽ āĻোāĻ¨ āĻā§াāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻাāĻ¨ি āĻ¨া āĻ¯েāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻুāĻ°āĻāĻ¨-āĻšাāĻĻীāĻ¸ে āĻŦাāĻ°āĻŦাāĻ° āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§্āĻ¯ে “āĻĻāĻ˛াāĻĻāĻ˛ি” āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻি āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻšুঁāĻļিā§াāĻ° āĻāĻ°া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻŽুāĻ°āĻ¤াāĻĻ āĻ¤āĻĨা āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽāĻ্āĻ¯ুāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦাāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛, āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽে āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§েāĻে। āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨ āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻ¯ে, āĻāĻ āĻļাāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻ¸্āĻĨা āĻেāĻ¨? āĻুāĻŦ āĻ¸ংāĻ্āĻˇেāĻĒে āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻĻেāĻ (āĻāĻ¤āĻ্āĻˇāĻŖ āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻাāĻāĻĒ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻāĻ° āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ˛াāĻāĻে āĻ¨া)। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ্āĻা āĻšāĻŦে, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¸ুāĻŦিāĻ§া āĻ¨িāĻŦা, āĻāĻ° āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ্āĻা āĻāĻ°āĻŦে, āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻŦেāĻ° āĻšā§ে āĻিā§ে āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¨াāĻŽে āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻ āĻĒāĻŦাāĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻŦা āĻāĻ° āĻĻুāĻ°্āĻ¨াāĻŽ āĻ°āĻাāĻŦা, āĻāĻা āĻ¤ো āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĻেāĻā§া āĻ¯াā§ āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻ āĻ¨া? āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻাāĻ˛ āĻ¨া āĻ˛াāĻāĻ˛ে āĻŦāĻāĻ˛ো, āĻĒāĻ°ে āĻŦিāĻ¸্āĻ¤াāĻ°িāĻ¤ āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻ¯া āĻāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨ে, āĻāĻ¨āĻļা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš।
- āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻাāĻ˛ো āĻ˛াāĻে āĻ¨াāĻ।
“āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ°ে। āĻ¨াāĻি āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻাāĻ āĻ¯াāĻŦেāĻ¨া??”
āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻāĻ˛াāĻĻা āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻĨাāĻāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸āĻŦāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻŽāĻ¤াāĻŽāĻ¤āĻ āĻ¯ৌāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻšā§। āĻ¤ুāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻিāĻ্āĻাāĻ¸া āĻāĻ° āĻ¯ে, āĻাāĻ¨āĻাঁāĻ°āĻĒুāĻ˛ āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¨ীāĻ˛āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤ āĻ¯াāĻā§া āĻ¯াā§ āĻেāĻŽāĻ¨ে, āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻেāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻļāĻšীāĻĻ āĻŽিāĻ¨াāĻ° āĻĻিā§ে āĻ¯াāĻ, āĻেāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻŦাংāĻ˛া āĻāĻাāĻĄেāĻŽীāĻ° āĻĒাāĻļ āĻĻিā§ে, āĻেāĻāĻŦা āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦে āĻŦুā§েāĻেāĻ° āĻĒাāĻļ āĻĻিā§ে। āĻāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻ¸āĻŦাāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŦাāĻĻāĻ āĻ¯ৌāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻāĻŦং āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖāĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻŽāĻ¤āĻেāĻĻ āĻšā§ āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻি āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ¸েāĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°ে āĻŽāĻ¤āĻেāĻĻāĻা āĻāĻĻৌ āĻ্āĻ°āĻšāĻŖāĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯ āĻ¨ā§। āĻāĻা āĻ āĻ¤্āĻ¯āĻ¨্āĻ¤ āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻĒূāĻ°্āĻŖāĻাāĻŦে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻŽাāĻŖ āĻāĻ°া āĻ¯াā§ āĻ¯ে, āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াāĻŦে āĻ¨া āĻāĻ āĻŽāĻ¤āĻাāĻ āĻ¸āĻ িāĻ āĻāĻŦং āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯āĻা āĻুāĻ˛।
-āĻāĻ āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°েāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ¤ে āĻšā§। āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ˛āĻ্āĻˇ্āĻ¯ āĻ িāĻ āĻĨাāĻে āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ¯ে āĻāĻĒাā§েāĻ āĻ˛āĻ্āĻˇ্āĻ¯ে āĻ¯াāĻā§া āĻšোāĻ āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¯াāĻā§া āĻ¯াāĻŦে।āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ¤ āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻŽা āĻāĻ¨āĻ¨্āĻĻāĻŽā§ীāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤াāĻ¨ুāĻ¸াāĻ°ে 'āĻ¯āĻ¤ āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻ¤āĻ¤ āĻĒāĻĨ' āĻ¸āĻ িāĻ āĻŽāĻ¤। āĻোāĻ°াāĻāĻ¨ে āĻāĻে,'āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻ¯া āĻ āĻŦāĻ¤ীāĻ°্āĻŖ āĻšā§েāĻে āĻ āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻĒূāĻ°্āĻŦে āĻ¯া āĻ āĻŦāĻ¤ীāĻ°্āĻŖ āĻšā§েāĻে āĻ¤াāĻ¤ে āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻāĻ°ে āĻ āĻĒāĻ°āĻ˛োāĻে āĻ¨িāĻļ্āĻিāĻ¤ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻāĻ°ে.........āĻ¤াāĻ°াāĻ āĻ¸āĻĢāĻ˛āĻাāĻŽ'- āĻ¸েāĻ āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻ¯াā§ী āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াā§ āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ āĻāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻĨা āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛্āĻ¯েāĻ āĻāĻে। āĻিāĻু āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻāĻেāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻিāĻু āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻŦāĻšেāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻ। āĻāĻŦং āĻļেāĻˇেāĻ°āĻĻিāĻে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻ°িāĻ¤ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽে āĻāĻেāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻāĻ āĻŽুāĻ˛ āĻāĻĨা। āĻ§āĻ°āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻļেāĻˇেāĻ°āĻĻিāĻে āĻ¯েāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻ°িāĻ¤ āĻšā§েāĻে āĻ¸েāĻুāĻ˛োāĻ āĻŦিāĻŦেāĻ্āĻ¯। āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻি āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ āĻšāĻā§া āĻāĻিāĻ¤ āĻিāĻ˛ āĻ¨া āĻāĻেāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻ āĻŽাāĻ¨āĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻŽি āĻ¸āĻ িāĻāĻĒāĻĨে āĻāĻি। āĻ¸েāĻা āĻ¯ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ āĻšোāĻ āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨। āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻেāĻ¨ো āĻļুāĻ§ুāĻŽাāĻ¤্āĻ° āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽেāĻ° āĻĒāĻĨেāĻ āĻ¯েāĻ¤ে āĻšāĻŦে? āĻāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻāĻেāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°āĻŦাāĻĻি āĻšāĻ āĻāĻŦং āĻাāĻ˛ো āĻাāĻ āĻāĻ°ি āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻেāĻ¨ো āĻāĻŽি āĻ¸্āĻŦāĻ°্āĻে/ āĻŦেāĻšেāĻ¸্āĻ¤ে āĻ¯েāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨া? āĻāĻŽি āĻ¤ āĻ¯েāĻোāĻ¨ āĻāĻĒাā§ে āĻ āĻীāĻˇ্āĻ āĻ˛āĻ্āĻˇ্āĻ¯ে āĻ¯েāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°ি। (āĻāĻ° āĻāĻŽি āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ āĻ¸āĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻ¨ āĻ°াāĻি āĻāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽāĻ āĻ˛ৌāĻিāĻāĻাāĻŦে āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻ¨া āĻāĻ°ি āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻŽূāĻ˛ 'āĻāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°'āĻ āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻ°াāĻি āĻāĻŦং āĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻĨে āĻĨাāĻি āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻāĻŽি āĻি āĻŦিāĻĒāĻĨāĻাāĻŽী āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻ¯াā§? )
“āĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻĨা āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻোāĻ¨ āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨āĻāĻ¤ āĻ āĻŽিāĻ˛ āĻĨাāĻāĻŦেāĻ। āĻিāĻাāĻŦে?!! āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ āĻāĻĨা। āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻ¤াāĻে āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻীāĻŦāĻ¨āĻ¸āĻ্āĻী āĻšিāĻ¸াāĻŦে āĻ¨িāĻ°্āĻŦাāĻāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦ āĻ¨া(āĻĒāĻ°িāĻŦাāĻ° āĻĨেāĻে āĻĒাāĻā§া āĻļিāĻ্āĻˇা)। āĻ¤াāĻ°āĻŽাāĻ¨ে āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻāĻāĻ°āĻ¨েāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻে।“
āĻš্āĻ¯াঁ, āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖেāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻ¤ো āĻĨাāĻাāĻাāĻ āĻ¸্āĻŦাāĻাāĻŦিāĻ। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻāĻ āĻ¤āĻĢাāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻি āĻāĻŽāĻ°া āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻĻুāĻ āĻোāĻে āĻĻেāĻāĻ¤ে āĻ¨া āĻĒাāĻ°াāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻĒāĻ°িāĻ¸্āĻĨিāĻ¤ি āĻ¤ৈāĻ°ি āĻāĻ°āĻŦ? āĻোāĻĻ āĻুāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ āĻĨেāĻেāĻ āĻāĻ¤্āĻ¤āĻ°āĻা āĻেāĻ¨ে āĻ¨াāĻ: “āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻ°ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ি āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦāĻ¸āĻ¤āĻŦাā§ি āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¤াā§িā§ে āĻĻেā§ āĻ¨ি, āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ্āĻে āĻ¸āĻĻ্āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻāĻŦং āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻ¤াāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¨িāĻˇেāĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻ¨ āĻ¨ি; āĻ¨িāĻļ্āĻā§ āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ¨। āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻ°ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻাāĻ°āĻŖে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻে āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŦāĻ¸āĻ¤āĻŦাā§ি āĻĨেāĻে āĻ¤াā§িā§ে āĻĻিā§েāĻে āĻāĻŦং āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻŦāĻšিāĻˇ্āĻাāĻ°েāĻ° āĻŦ্āĻ¯াāĻĒাāĻ°ে āĻĒৃāĻˇ্āĻ āĻĒোāĻˇāĻāĻ¤া āĻāĻ°েāĻে, āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ুāĻ¤্āĻŦ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¨িāĻˇেāĻ§ āĻāĻ°েāĻেāĻ¨। āĻāĻ° āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ুāĻ¤্āĻŦ āĻāĻ°āĻŦে, āĻ¤াāĻ°া āĻ¤ো āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻ āĻ¤্āĻ¯াāĻাāĻ°ী।“ (āĻ¸ূāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻŽāĻ¤াāĻšিāĻ¨াāĻš ā§Ŧā§Ļ:ā§Ž-ā§¯) āĻ¸ুāĻ¤āĻ°াং, āĻ¯াāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻ¯ুāĻĻ্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°āĻে āĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻাāĻ°াāĻĒ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻ¤ো āĻŦāĻ˛া āĻšā§āĻ āĻ¨ি, āĻāĻĒāĻ°āĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻাāĻ˛ āĻŦ্āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšাāĻ° āĻāĻŦং āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖ āĻāĻāĻ°āĻŖ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻ¤āĻ¸াāĻš āĻĻেāĻā§া āĻšāĻ্āĻে āĻāĻ āĻāĻĨা āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻ¯ে, āĻ¨্āĻ¯াā§āĻĒāĻ°াā§āĻŖāĻাāĻ°ীāĻĻেāĻ°āĻে āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻাāĻ˛āĻŦাāĻ¸েāĻ¨।
- āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨ āĻিāĻ˛ āĻেāĻ¨ āĻāĻ¸āĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤ি āĻāĻĻাāĻ° āĻšāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻ˛ āĻ¨া? āĻেāĻ¨ āĻ āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻŦৈāĻŦাāĻšিāĻ āĻ¸āĻŽ্āĻĒāĻ°্āĻ āĻ āĻŦৈāĻ§ āĻāĻ°ে āĻĻিāĻ˛?? āĻ¨াāĻি āĻāĻাāĻ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻ। āĻāĻŽি/āĻāĻŽāĻ°া āĻ¨িāĻেāĻĻেāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻāĻ°ে āĻāĻ āĻ¨ীāĻ¤ি āĻাāĻ˛ু āĻāĻ°েāĻি ??
@Atiq,
Allah created the mankind; they should worship Him.”
Contradiction: 3:97, 35:15 say “Allah does not need mankind and the jinns; He is free of
all want.”
-āĻāĻ¤ে āĻāĻ¤িāĻেāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻāĻāĻŽāĻ¤।
>> "Forget about the people. Can you think?"
ReplyDelete> At least I try to.
No you don’t. Your every thinking is religion-centred even you don’t think neutrally. Your every word is backed from a religion called Islam. When you at first assume the wrong answer as true how will you be able to differentiate true answer from wrong? I am not saying to assume that religion as wrong. At least don’t take it as correct. That’ll be helpfully neutral to start the thinking correctly. God damn if you could ever do that!
- āĻāĻাāĻ¨ে āĻāĻĒāĻ¤্āĻ¤ি āĻāĻে। āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻāĻ āĻšā§ে āĻĨাāĻে āĻāĻļ্āĻŦāĻ°েāĻ° āĻĻোāĻšাāĻ āĻেāĻ¨??!!!
O.T: āĻŦেāĻļীāĻ°āĻাāĻ āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°েāĻ (āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻĻেāĻা)āĻāĻāĻা āĻ¸āĻŽā§ে āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻুāĻŦ āĻāĻ°্āĻŦāĻাāĻŦে āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻŦেā§াā§ āĻāĻŽি āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ। āĻāĻŦং āĻোāĻ° āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻ āĻĻাā§ āĻāĻ°াā§ āĻ¯েāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻāĻŽি/āĻāĻŽāĻ°া āĻāĻŽāĻ˛ে āĻ¨া āĻ¨িā§ে āĻĒাāĻ°িāĻ¨া। āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤ু āĻĒāĻ°ে āĻāĻĻেāĻ° āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤াāĻ° āĻāĻĻাāĻ°্āĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻĨে āĻāĻĻেāĻ° āĻাāĻ°্āĻ¯āĻāĻ˛াāĻĒেāĻ° āĻŽিāĻ˛ āĻĒাāĻ āĻ¨াāĻ। āĻāĻŽāĻ¨āĻি āĻāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¨েāĻāĻেāĻ āĻāĻ্āĻāĻ°āĻĒāĻ¨্āĻĨী āĻোāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻšāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĻেāĻেāĻি।āĻļেāĻˇ āĻŦā§āĻ¸ে āĻāĻ°া āĻেāĻ¨ āĻোāĻ˛া āĻোāĻ āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°ে āĻĢেāĻ˛ে(āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻাā§)?? āĻāĻা āĻি āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ্āĻাāĻৃāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻি āĻ āĻাāĻ¨্āĻ¤েāĻ :-? :-s
@āĻĢাāĻ˛āĻ¤ু,
ReplyDeleteI don't believe in traditional God who cares about mankind. I have very different perceptions on the word God.
> God damn if you could ever do that!
It was completely not intentional that I mentioned that word. See that fundamentalist has no intention to learn anything. He knows nothing but from one side and he thinks he knows everything. Too much complacence. That's what made me little bit angry not seeing any change on his on sided biased point of view.
āĻāĻŽি āĻি āĻāĻ°্āĻŦāĻāĻ°ে āĻāĻāĻ¨ো āĻŦāĻ˛েāĻি āĻāĻŽি āĻ¨াāĻ¸্āĻ¤িāĻ? āĻāĻ¤ে āĻāĻ°্āĻŦেāĻ° āĻিāĻু āĻ¨াāĻ। āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻŦাāĻ¸ āĻ¸āĻŽ্āĻĒূāĻ°্āĻŖ āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻাāĻে।
> āĻāĻŽāĻ¨āĻি āĻāĻĻেāĻ° āĻ āĻ¨েāĻāĻেāĻ āĻāĻ্āĻāĻ°āĻĒāĻ¨্āĻĨী āĻোāĻ°া āĻŽুāĻ¸āĻ˛িāĻŽ āĻšāĻ¤েāĻ āĻĻেāĻেāĻি।āĻļেāĻˇ āĻŦāĻ¯়āĻ¸ে āĻāĻ°া āĻেāĻ¨ āĻোāĻ˛া āĻোāĻ āĻŦāĻ¨্āĻ§ āĻāĻ°ে āĻĢেāĻ˛ে(āĻŽāĻ¤ āĻĒাāĻ˛āĻাāĻ¯়)?? āĻāĻা āĻি āĻ¤াāĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ্āĻাāĻৃāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻি āĻ āĻাāĻ¨্āĻ¤েāĻ?
If you think it's a craze and proud to be atheist and you become atheist just for that and there is no reasoning and matches on your life it's no surprise that you might become Muslim again. Atheists are very much philanthropists & they have good contributions for mankind. Not only there are agnostics, seculars and many types. It depends on you what belief you cling to. I agree with you there should be matches in people's work with their belief.
Obviously the people you are talking about are too weak to be atheists.
> You have mentioned many other issues which can be logically refuted very easily. However, as I found out from your last posts that you're in fact not acting neutral, therefore I think that refuting those would only waste my valuable time. By grace of Allaah, I have all the patience, knowledge and expertise needed to clear all your confusions, but first, you must comply to the following……….
ReplyDeleteThat’s why I said your arrogant and complacent existence came here to do nothing but deny. āĻ¤িāĻ˛āĻে āĻ¤াāĻ˛ āĻŦাāĻ¨িāĻ¯়ে āĻšāĻāĻ˛েāĻ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤্āĻ¯াāĻ্āĻ¯াāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤েāĻ āĻšāĻŦে।
“Indeed, your Lord is Allaah, Who created the heavens and the earth in Six Days, and then He rose over (Istawa) the Throne (really in a manner that suits His Majesty). He brings the night as a cover over the day, seeking it rapidly, and (He created) the sun, the moon, the stars subjected to His Command. Surely, His is the creation and commandment. Blessed is Allaah, the Lord of the ‘Aalameen (mankind, jinn and all that exists)!”
ReplyDelete[al-A’raaf 7:54]
What I understand from this is that Allaah created the heavens and the earth in six days. This is clear.
But in another passage Allaah mentions the creation of the heavens and the earth, and He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Say (O Muhammad): Do you verily disbelieve in Him Who created the earth in two Days? And you set up rivals (in worship) with Him? That is the Lord of the ‘Aalameen (mankind, jinn and all that exists).
He placed therein (i.e. the earth) firm mountains from above it, and He blessed it, and measured therein its sustenance (for its dwellers) in four Days equal (i.e. all these four ‘days’ were equal in the length of time) for all those who ask (about its creation).
Then He rose over (Istawa) towards the heaven when it was smoke, and said to it and to the earth: ‘Come both of you willingly or unwillingly.’ They both said: ‘We come willingly.’
Then He completed and finished from their creation (as) seven heavens in two Days and He made in each heaven its affair. And We adorned the nearest (lowest) heaven with lamps (stars) to be an adornment as well as to guard (from the devils by using them as missiles against the devils). Such is the Decree of Him, the All-Mighty, the All-Knower”
[Fussilat 41:9-12]
Then He “placed therein (i.e. the earth) firm mountains from above it, and He blessed it, and measured therein its sustenance (for its dwellers)” in four days equal– i.e., in two days that were added to the two days in which He created the earth, so the total is four days. It does not say that the creation of the mountains and the measuring of the sustenance took four days.
--- http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/31865/
It does not say that the creation of the mountains and the measuring of the sustenance took two days.
“Quran 2: 29 It is He who hath created for you all things that are on Earth; THEN He turned to the Heaven and made them into seven firmaments (Skies)….
Quran 79: 27 - 30 Are you the harder to create, or is the heaven that He built? He raised the height thereof and ordered it; and He has made dark the night thereof, and He brought forth the morning thereof. And after that, He spread (flattened) the earth”
And does it match modern science? Do you believe that, Earth was created first, after that, God created Heaven? Modern science tells us that? Or how come seven firmaments (layers)? Modern science tells us that, actually there is no such thing Sky is no “roof” over us. It is only a space with no known boundary at all. These verses simply reinforce the ancient idea of ROOF over us which is called SKY, is it not so? How funny!
Mention if your translations are different.
I searched for refutation of contradiction related to Sun-set and Sun-rise. Couldn’t find relevant result. May be you would find. Contradiction statement is there: http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/contradictions.htm
ReplyDeleteYou might post the refutations here or send me through emails. I want to see refutations of all on that page:
4- A Resting Place For Sun!?
5- Why Allah Created Stars!
6- Is Sky/Heaven A ROOF or Canopy Over the Earth?
7- Does Sun Rotate Around the Earth?
8- Does Earth Spread Out Like Carpet (flat)
9- Is Man Created From Clotted Blood?
10- Is Religion Compulsive or is it not?
And for contradictions on this pages: http://islamic.org.uk/internalc.html [some contradictions might be repeated]
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=54
> LOLz… When you can’t answer to a logical argument, just label it as ‘fatwa’!!! Rather than emotionally calling it a ‘patched fatwa’, try to logically refute the arguments if you can. ;)
ReplyDeleteNope I was not emotional. Seems like you don’t verify your referred links: http://www.islamqa.com/en/ref/31865/
They labeled it as fatwa no. 31865.
>> ā§Ģ 'āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻাāĻ˛েāĻ°, āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻ¯ুāĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻŦিāĻৃāĻ¤āĻাāĻŦে āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¯োāĻ্āĻ¯' āĻāĻŦং 'āĻ āĻāĻ¯়াāĻ¤ āĻ¨াāĻ¯িāĻ˛েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻĻাāĻ¸ āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻিāĻ˛ো, āĻ¸ে āĻĒāĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ°েāĻ্āĻˇিāĻ¤ে āĻ¤āĻāĻ¨āĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻĨাāĻা āĻāĻ¸েāĻিāĻ˛ো' - āĻāĻĻুāĻি āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯় āĻি?
> Of course these two wordings are contradictory. But the fact is, Islaam never says that slavery was only for the ancient period, rather it’s for all periods. For details, see the above link…
Why do you always misunderstand simple things? I didn’t say slavery is gone. At the time of advent of Islam slavery was a disease of the society which had even legitimate forms. And Quran supported it. But now slavery is abominable and completely against law, banned, restricted everywhere over the world.
The matter of fact that quran supports it means it worn out.
>> ā§ 'āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸া. āĻāĻ° āĻāĻĨা-āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻāĻŖেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻāĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়, āĻ āĻ¨ুāĻ¸āĻ°āĻŖীāĻ¯়' āĻ 'āĻ āĻšুāĻুāĻŽ āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻāĻĒāĻ¨াāĻ°āĻ āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯, āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻŽু'āĻŽিāĻ¨āĻĻেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¨āĻ¯়'- āĻāĻĻুāĻিāĻ āĻি āĻĒāĻ°āĻˇ্āĻĒāĻ°āĻŦিāĻ°োāĻ§ী āĻ¨āĻ¯়?
> Nope. Take an example. Suppose a teacher says to his class – “this rule is applicable to all of you. However, it’s not applicable to students X and Y because of such and such.” Is there any problem? If you make it clear which rulings are for all people and which are for a few particular people, then where is the contradiction??
Still you didn’t get it.
āĻুāĻŦ āĻŽāĻা āĻĒাāĻ্āĻিāĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻ¯āĻāĻ¨ āĻļাāĻ°াāĻĢাāĻ¤েāĻ° āĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ˛াāĻāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻĒā§āĻিāĻ˛াāĻŽ। āĻ¸āĻŦāĻেā§ে āĻŽāĻাāĻ° āĻŦেāĻĒাāĻ° āĻāĻ āĻ¯ে āĻŦেāĻļিāĻ°āĻাāĻ āĻ্āĻˇেāĻ¤্āĻ°েāĻ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻŽāĻ¨ে āĻšā§েāĻে āĻ¯ে āĻāĻ¤িāĻ āĻ¯া āĻŦুāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻেā§েāĻে āĻļাāĻ°াāĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻāĻ¤ো āĻāĻীāĻ°ে āĻ¨া āĻĸুāĻে āĻেāĻŦāĻ˛ āĻļাāĻŦ্āĻĻিāĻ āĻ āĻ°্āĻĨāĻুāĻ˛ো āĻŦুāĻāĻ¤ে āĻ¸āĻ্āĻˇāĻŽ āĻšā§েāĻে āĻāĻŦং āĻŦিāĻাāĻ°-āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻ˛েāĻˇāĻŖāĻ āĻ¸েāĻাāĻ āĻāĻ°েāĻে। āĻ˛āĻিāĻ āĻĻিā§ে āĻুāĻ˛āĻেā§া āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻ˛েāĻˇāĻŖ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻĻāĻ°āĻাāĻ° āĻি? āĻāĻāĻু āĻŦিāĻŦেāĻāĻŦোāĻ§,āĻŽāĻ¨ুāĻˇ্āĻ¯āĻ¤্āĻ¤ āĻāĻ° āĻĻāĻ°্āĻļāĻ¨ āĻĨাāĻāĻ˛েāĻ āĻāĻāĻা āĻ¸ুāĻ¸্āĻĒāĻˇ্āĻ āĻšā§ে āĻāĻ ে āĻোāĻ¨āĻা āĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨āĻা āĻŽিāĻĨ্āĻ¯া।
ReplyDeleteāĻļাāĻ°াāĻĢাāĻ¤ āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻ°িāĻĒ্āĻ˛াāĻā§েāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻ¤্āĻ¯েāĻāĻা āĻ˛াāĻāĻ¨ āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻ§āĻ°ে āĻāĻŽি āĻŦুāĻিā§ে āĻĻিāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻ¤াāĻŽ āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻুāĻ˛āĻুāĻ˛ো āĻোāĻĨাā§ āĻোāĻĨাā§, āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻĻূঃāĻেāĻ° āĻŦিāĻˇā§ āĻāĻ āĻ¯ে āĻāĻŽি āĻāĻāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻŦিāĻˇā§ে āĻŦেāĻļি āĻ¯ুāĻ্āĻ¤ি-āĻ¤āĻ°্āĻ āĻĻিā§ে āĻ¨িāĻেāĻ° āĻŦুāĻĻ্āĻ§ি-āĻ্āĻাāĻ¨āĻুāĻ˛ো āĻাāĻšিāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ্āĻি āĻ¨া।
āĻļুāĻ§ু āĻāĻāĻা āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻļ্āĻ¨ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻ? āĻে āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ/āĻিāĻ¤াāĻŦ/āĻāĻ˛্āĻ˛াāĻš āĻāĻ¸āĻŦ āĻ¨িāĻ°āĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇāĻাāĻŦে āĻŦিāĻাāĻ°-āĻŦিāĻļ্āĻ˛েāĻˇāĻŖ āĻāĻ°াāĻ° āĻ¸াāĻŽāĻ°্āĻĨ āĻ°াāĻে? āĻāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇ āĻ¯াāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻোāĻ¨ো āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻŦ āĻ¨াāĻ, āĻ¨াāĻি āĻāĻ°েāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻ¯াāĻ° āĻāĻĒāĻ° āĻāĻāĻা āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻļāĻ্āĻ¤িāĻļাāĻ˛ী āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻŦ (āĻূāĻĒ্āĻ°āĻাāĻŦ) āĻāĻে?
āĻĒৃāĻĨীāĻŦিāĻ° āĻĻিāĻে āĻ¤াāĻিā§ে āĻĻেāĻ,āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¤া āĻāĻ°,āĻ¨িāĻ°āĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇ āĻšā§ে āĻ¸āĻ¤্āĻ¯েāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ¨্āĻ§াāĻ¨ āĻāĻ°। āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽেāĻ° āĻāĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻāĻ āĻĒৃāĻĨিāĻŦীāĻ¤ে āĻ¯ে āĻ āĻļাāĻ¨্āĻ¤িāĻ° āĻ˛ীāĻ˛া, āĻŽৃāĻ¤্āĻ¯ুāĻ° āĻā§াāĻā§ি āĻ¤োāĻŽাāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĨাāĻāĻĨিāĻ¤ āĻ¸ৃāĻˇ্āĻিāĻāĻ°্āĻ¤া āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻ¤া āĻাāĻ¨āĻ¤েāĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻšāĻ˛ে āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇāĻে āĻĒৃāĻĨিāĻŦীāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ াāĻ¤েāĻ¨ āĻ¨া। āĻāĻ° āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻেāĻ¨েāĻ āĻĒাāĻ িā§ে āĻĨাāĻেāĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻŦে āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻিāĻুāĻ āĻŦāĻ˛াāĻ° āĻ¨াāĻ। āĻ¤ুāĻŽিāĻ āĻŦিāĻাāĻ° āĻāĻ°āĻŦে।
>> ā§ āĻোāĻ°āĻāĻ¨ে āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš(āĻŦাāĻ˛্āĻ¯ āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻš ) āĻĒ্āĻ°āĻĨা āĻ°āĻĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ˛ো āĻ¨া āĻেāĻ¨ো? āĻŽুāĻšাāĻŽ্āĻŽাāĻĻ āĻ¸. āĻāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦāĻļেāĻˇ (āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšāĻৃāĻ¤) āĻ¸্āĻ¤্āĻ°ী āĻŦিāĻŦি āĻāĻ¯়েāĻļা āĻ°া. āĻŦিāĻŦাāĻšেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¯় āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ (āĻ¤িāĻ¨ি āĻ¨āĻŦীāĻীāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°্āĻŦাāĻĒেāĻ্āĻˇা āĻĒ্āĻ°িāĻ¯়āĻ āĻিāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ে āĻাāĻ¨া āĻ¯াāĻ¯়) āĻāĻāĻে āĻāĻ āĻāĻ°্āĻŽ āĻেāĻ āĻāĻ°āĻ¤ে āĻাāĻāĻ˛ে, āĻ§āĻ°্āĻŽ āĻি āĻāĻāĻাāĻ¤ে āĻĒাāĻ°āĻŦে?
ReplyDelete>First of all, what do you mean by āĻ¨াāĻŦাāĻ˛িāĻা ? Is it just the prior time of the natural age of puberty? Or is it the ‘human-defined’ prior time of 18 years??
It’s the law of the country and same kind of law exists over the world. The law states to reach 18 years before getting married.
Indolent marriages, fatwa and salish crimes have been consistent news in our daily newspapers. They are human beings misguided by Quran causing oppression on women, child and their relatives. The effect is such intense that social awareness programs and human right organizations’ measures don’t work often. The imams of mosques aver fatwas which in most cases intolerant punishments for innocent people. Depressing indeed. Quran has contributions on making the world worse every day. For example this news was published in daily star,
“Last month, a woman in Brahmanbaria, first alleged to have been raped and later said to have had a relationship with the man, was married off by her parents to a different man. Finding her seven months pregnant one month into their marriage, the husband divorced her. After returning to her parent's village, the woman was tried by a local salish or arbitration led by village elders and rural clergy and sentenced to 101 lashings and a fine of Tk. 1,000. Later, however, the father of her child was pressured into marrying her and the woman, who had at first filed a case against the arbitrators who had punished her, took the case back.”
How cruel is that! It should give some foods for thoughts.
>About your mentioned lalon’s song and similarly Nazrul’s poem – I don’t understand songs and poems well. However, I think the mentioned song and poem are not that difficult to understand. Just mentioning one line from the song (actually the summary line): “āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻ°āĻিāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ¨ি, āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇে āĻ°āĻিāĻ¤ āĻাāĻ¨ি āĻ˛াāĻ˛āĻ¨ āĻĢāĻিāĻ° āĻāĻ¯়!”. If that’s the case, then I’d say: Lalon is saying that what HE knows is that religions are made by people. However, what I (and billions of people other than me) know is that Islaam and Quraan has been revealed from Allaah the Almighty. Have any doubt? Then let’s share it. :)
You are right. You didn’t understand. Fakir Lalon and other fakirs/gurus of his time knew about contradictory facts about Islam and Quran. On the following lines of his famous song:
“āĻি āĻাāĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻĒাāĻ াāĻāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻļাāĻšী āĻĻāĻ¯়াāĻŽāĻ¯়!
āĻāĻেāĻ āĻĻেāĻļেāĻ° āĻāĻেāĻ āĻাāĻˇা āĻāĻ¯় āĻোāĻĻা āĻĒাāĻ াāĻ¯়?
āĻāĻ āĻ¯ুāĻে āĻ¯া āĻĒাāĻ াāĻ¯় āĻাāĻ˛াāĻŽ,
āĻ āĻ¨্āĻ¯ āĻ¯ুāĻে āĻšāĻ¯় āĻেāĻ¨ āĻšাāĻ°াāĻŽ!
āĻāĻŽāĻ¨ি āĻĻেāĻি āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻ¤াāĻŽাāĻŽ! āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻĻেāĻা āĻ¯াāĻ¯়!
āĻ¯āĻĻি āĻāĻāĻ āĻোāĻĻাāĻ° āĻšāĻ¯় āĻ°āĻāĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻ¤ে āĻ¤ো āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻĨাāĻে āĻ¨া!
āĻŽাāĻ¨ুāĻˇেāĻ° āĻ¸āĻāĻ˛ āĻ°āĻāĻ¨া, āĻ¤াāĻ āĻ¯ে āĻিāĻ¨্āĻ¨ āĻšāĻ¯়!
āĻি āĻাāĻ˛াāĻŽ āĻĒাāĻ াāĻāĻ˛েāĻ¨ āĻāĻŽাāĻ° āĻļাāĻšী āĻĻāĻ¯়াāĻŽāĻ¯়!”
he mentioned some of his philosophical views and stated that Quran is rather written by mankind than a God or Gods.
Our rebel poet Kazi Nazrul Islam was also an Islami researcher, composer of numerous Islami songs. He knew the facts about the so called divine book too.
It’s not doubt. It’s truth.
>Below are the translations of the actual aayaahs in the referred chapter and verse numbers:
ReplyDelete>2:21. O mankind! Worship your Lord Who created you and those who were before you so that you may become Al-MuttaqÃģn (the pious).
>3:97. ...and whoever disbelieves, then AllÃĸh stands not in need of any of the 'AlamÃŽn (mankind and jinns).
>35:15. O mankind! it is you who are the needy, but AllÃĸh is Rich (Free of all wants and needs), Worthy of all praise.
That was the summarized version of the verses quoted from the book of author Abul Kashem. Because of the fact that you are arrogant you think that only your translations make sense. Let’s take your translation into account.
2:21 says worship lord to become Al-MuttaqÃģn. If you are not Al-MuttaqÃģn you are not qualified. You cannot go to heaven rather you’ll be punished. Now does the author’s compilation make any sense?
This is indeed a contradiction in Quran.
> You think that religion is imposed on people. However, Islaam never says to impose it on anybody. Rather surah Kaafiroon (chapter 109) says that if you don't want to come to Islaam, then be with your own religion/view. Islaam is for people's own good. If they don't want it, nobody has the right to force them accepting it. Rather Allaah says in the holy quran (2:256) "There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path."
This is not true because of the fact that it also states that infidels will be punished severely and they will be damned to hell (interpretation for not being permitted to heaven). Infidels are represented negatively. It’s why the religion is called to impose making the followers think they are the best among all. People excluding them actually don’t deserve anything good.
> The Quraan has indeed been preserved without any modification. You're asking about different copies. Tell me, our Bangabandhu gave a historic speech on 7th March; has it been preserved? Of course it is. But it wasn't a written document, it was a speech. Now, if you write in plain bangla and if you write it in Banglish (Bangla text written with English characters which is common in messenger chats), if both of them sound like the original speech when read, then would you say that his speech has been modified because of different copies?? Quraan was revealed as speech, not as a written script. All the copies of Quraan that you think to be 'different' actually sounds exactly the same when they are recited. So, it indeed has been preserved.
ReplyDeleteYou are heretic and pathetic. I’m quoting from freethinker Abul Kashem’s book:
“This inquiry is intimately connected with the question: Is Mohammed the last prophet/apostle of Allah and is Quran the final book of Allah?
When I searched the Quran I could find only the following verse which deals with this matter.
33:40 Muhammad is not The father of any Of your men, but (he is) The apostle of God And the Seal of the Prophets: And God has full knowledge Of all things. (Translation by A. Yusufali)
In his commentary on this issue, Yusufali writes:
"When a document is sealed, it is complete and there can be no further addition. The holy Prophet Muhammad closed the long line of Apostles. God's teaching is and will always be continuous, but there has been and be no Prophet after Muhammed. The later ages will want thinkers and reformers, not Prophets. This is not an arbitrary matter. It is a matter full of knowledge and wisdom: "for God has full knowledge of all things." (A. Yusufali; THE
HOLY QUR'AN Translation; page 1119, commentary number 3731)"
If we accept this explanation of Yusufali, then, of course, Mohammed is the last prophet and the apostle of Allah. But there are many Muslims (?) who do not believe in Yusufali's analysis; like the Qadiani Muslims (or Ahmedia). They accept the Quran but do not accept Mohammad as the last prophet. How about the followers of Rashad Khalifa? They make a clear distinction between a prophet and an apostle. So, their version of the finality of Mohammad and the Quran is quite different. They accept only the Quran and consider Mohammad as a messenger only and not the final prophet. In fact, Rashad Khalifa claims that he had a dream where he was transported to heaven to meet Mohammad and he (Mohammad) asked to him rescue the Muslims from the present day decay (that implies that Rashad Khalifa is the next prophet after Mohammad). Rashad Khalifa's followers consider the mainstream followers (that is Sunni, Shia, Ahmedia...etc) to be the followers of Satan and not true Muslims. They even have their own version of the Quran and refuse to accpet the Shia/Sunni/Ahmedi versions. What do all these controversies prove? Yes, Quran is not really an unalterable document that many innocent Muslims tend to believe. You can really manipulate this doctrine of hate to suit your needs. There is no central authority on Quranic matters for the Sunnis who form the bulk of the present Muslims. So, it is like a fish market. Anything goes as long as you have the money and the clout to do that.
If you are a true freethinker/humanist you should not accept any of these stories. We must accept the fact that the Quran is a complete hoax and is never a revelation of Allah (or God), but it (the Quran) is the concoction of a megalomaniac who used the illiterate and the uncultured Arab Beduins to impose his narcissistic ambition to conquer the world through brute force.
If you are not accepting this truth then you are not a complete freethinker/humanist, your umbilical cord with Islam is not cut yet. You are more of an Islamic Agnost or a Islamic Freethinker or the latest invention, Islamic Atheist!!
-- Abul Kasem”